Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


CIT v. India Cements Ltd [2025] 180 taxmann.com 564 / (2026) 484 ITR 30 (Mad)(HC)

S. 115JA: Company-Book profit-Voluntary retirement scheme-Advertisement expenditure-Order of Tribunal allowing the claim is affirmed. [S.260A]

CIT v. Indra Housing [2025] 178 taxmann.com 722 / (2026) 484 ITR 3 (Mad)(HC)

S. 80IB(10): Housing projects-undertaking-Joint venture development agreement with landowners-Failure to produce document-Interpretation of taxing statutes–Exemptions–Strict construction-Order of Tribunal set aside. [S.260A]

Tilok Tirath Vidyavati Chhuttani Trust v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 316 / 183 taxmann.com 237 (P & H)(HC)

S. 80G : Donation-Trust-Charitable purpose-Providing low-cost medical facilities to the public-Entitled to exemption. [S. 12A, Art. 226]

Abhar Holdings Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. CIT [2025] 180 taxmann.com 508 / (2026) 484 ITR 612(Guj)(HC)

S. 73 : Losses in speculation business –Shares received by assessee through conversion of partly convertible debentures by allotment from company’s own capital-No purchase and sale activity by assessee-Shares allotted to assessee by company from its own capital-Tribunal was not justified in holding that the loss on account of sale of shares was speculation loss and could not be set off against the other income. [S.28(i),]

Sheela Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2026) 484 ITR 486/ 183 taxmann.com 236 (Delhi)(HC))

S. 68: Cash credits-Unsecured loan-Share capital-Identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transaction established-Source of source not required to be explained-Finance Act, 2022 (2022) 442 ITR (St) 91-Addition deleted. [S. 260A]

Vidarbha Veneer Industries Ltd. (In Liquidation) v. ITO [2025] 174 taxmann.com 223 /(2026) 484 ITR 132 (Bom)(HC)

50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Capital asset-Held by an assessee-Transfer-Lease premises-Provision is applicable to leasehold right-Appeal of assessee dismissed [S. 2(14), 260A]

DIT (IT) v American Express Bank Ltd. (2026) 484 ITR 137/ 308 Taxman 246 / 348 CTR 38 / 256 DTR 497 (SC) DIT(IT) v. Oman International Bank S.A. O.G (Now Doha Bank) 2026) 484 ITR 137/ 308 Taxman 246 / 348 CTR 38 / 256 DTR 497 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Emirates Commercial Bank Ltd. [2003] 262 ITR 55/[2004] 134 Taxman 682 (Bom) (HC) disapproved. DIT (IT) v. American Express Bank Ltd. [IT Appeal No. 1294 of 2013, dated 1-4-2015(Bom)(HC) set aside.

S. 44C: Non-residents-Head office expenditure-Broad and inclusive-No indication that “exclusive expenditure”-expenditure exclusively incurred for branch in India, to be excluded from its ambit-“Attributable to”-Encompasses both shared expenses allocated to India branches and exclusive expenses incurred for India branches-Expense was common expense or exclusively for Indian branch not material so long as expense incurred for business or profession-Allowable as deduction-Expenditure incurred outside India-Authorities have not recorded factual finding-Matters remanded to the Tribunal-“Attributable”-“Exclusive”-“Attributable to”-“Derived from”-Interpretation of taxing statues-Strict interpretation-DTAA-India-United States of America. [S.37(1), Art. 7(3),]

CIT v. India Cements Ltd [2025] 180 taxmann.com 564 / (2026) 484 ITR 30 (Mad)(HC)

S. 41(1): Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Sales tax liability treated as a loan under State Government Scheme-Liability assigned to another party at net present value of sum payable after twelve years-Not cessation of liability-Entire liability to pay stood discharged on assignment. [S. 260A]

Sharp Business System v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 496 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial : Reversed in Sharp Business System (Through Finance Director Mr. Yoshihisa Mizuno) v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 509 // 308 Taxman 285 (SC)

S.37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Compete fees paid to keep erstwhile partner from doing competing business for seven years. Arrangement to endure for a substantial period, i.e., seven years certain position in the market by keeping the erstwhile partner out-Payment was Capital expenditure.

CIT v. India Cements Ltd [2025] 180 taxmann.com 564 / (2026) 484 ITR 30 (Mad)(HC)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Payment to employees under voluntary retirement scheme-Revenue expenditure-Advertisement of newly launched products-Tribunal restricting allowance to 10 per cent. Of claim-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 260A]