Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Toyota Boshoku Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 98 ITR 363 (Bang) (Trib)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Capital or revenue-Setting up of plant-Facts identical to assessee’s earlier own case-Details of expenditure to be furnished for verification. [S. 37(1)]

Sasamusa Sugar Works Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 98 ITR 235 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 32: Depreciation-Molasses Tanks-Matter remanded for verification.

Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)98 ITR 521 (Chd) (Trib)

S. 32: Depreciation-Additional depreciation-Claim not made in return-Subsequent letter the Assessing Officer-Justified in allowing the claim.

Young Indian v. ACIT (E) (2022) 95 ITR 33 (SN) / 218 TTJ 1 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 28(iv) : Business income-Value of any benefit or perquisites-Company-Principle of lifting of corporate veil-Converted in to money or not-Directors transferring shares to persons in control of company which had discontinued news paper business-Not a case of acquisition of shares simpliciter-Benefit derived by transaction to be taxed as arising from business from adventure in nature of trade-Not as income from other sources-Valuation of benefit at fair market value of property proper. [S. 2(13) 28(i), 56, 56(2)viib), R. 11UA]

Interglobe Aviation Ltd. (Indigo) v. Add. CIT (2022)95 ITR 586 (SB) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 28(1) : Business income-Capital or revenue-Benefit or perquisite arising from business-Engine manufacturer giving assessee credit for selecting its engines-Not assessable as revenue receipt or capital gains-Capital receipts-Construction of documents-Nature of receipt to be judged in hands of recipient-Entries in books of account not determinative of character of receipt as income. [S.4, 28(iv), 45, 48]

Xchanging Solutions Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)96 ITR 544 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Advances given to employees for meeting expenses-Amounts irrecoverable-Allowable as business loss-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination. [S. 37(1)]

George Oakes Ltd v. ACIT (2022) 97 ITR 44 (SN) (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 28(i): Business loss-Embezzled-Loss deemed to be arisen when assessee comes to know about it and on realization on non recovery despite multiple attempts-Police complaints, Banking ombudsman etc-Write off on loss due to embezzlement allowable. [S. 145]

Dy. CIT v. Global Wool Alliance Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 100 ITR 12 (SN) (Kol)(Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Working capital-Allowable as business loss. [S. 37(1)]

Herbalife International India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 100 ITR 456 (Bang.) (Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Fluctuation in foreign exchange-Restatement of outstanding liabilities on revenue items-Allowable as revenue expenditure. [S. 37(1)]

Amarnath Aggarwal Builders Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2022) 99 ITR 194 (Amritsar) (Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Real estate business-Purchase of land-Litigation-Stock in trade-Allowable as business loss.