Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dy. CIT v. Cello Pens & Stationary (P) Ltd. (2022) 215 TTJ 486 / 210 DTR 53 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Business expenditure-Commodities trading-Non-recovery of purchase cost of goods paid to National Spot Exchange (NSEL)-Allowable as business loss [S. 37(1), 145]

Dy. CIT v. Mahendra Brothers Exports Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 99 ITR 537 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Forward contract-Hedging transactions through banks-Loss allowable as business loss and not speculation loss. [S. 43(5), 73]

ITO v. Roj Enterprises (P) Ltd. (2022) 219 TTJ 70 (UO) (Pune)(Trib)

S. 28(i): Business loss-Operationalising a sick company-Loss is allowable as business loss. [S. 37(1)]

ITO v. Roj Enerprises (P) Ltd. (2022) 219 TTJ 70 (UO)(Pune)(Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Running of sick company-Business loss allowable as deduction. [S. 37(1)]

Dilip Bhattu Karanjule v. ITO (2022)100 ITR 59 (SN) (Pune)(Trib)

S. 28(i) : Business income-Capital gains-Purchase and sale of agricultural lands-Transactions were adventure in nature of trade-Assessable as business income. [S. 2(13), 45]

ITO v. Mamta Rajivkumar Agarwal (Smt.) (2022)100 ITR 17 (SN)(Ahd) (Trib)

S. 24 : Income from house property-Deductions-Interest on housing loan-Jointly borrowed with husband-Interest allowable as deduction. [S. 24(b)]

Krishna Build Home (P) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 219 TTJ 165 (Jaipur)(Trib)

S. 23 : Income from house property-Annual value-Unsold units in commercial complex held as stock-in-trade-Notional value cannot be assessed-Reassessment beyond four years held to be not valid-Reassessment with in four years and assessment completed under section 143(1)-Reassessment is valid. [S. 22, 23(5), 24(a), 143(1)(143(3), 147, 148]

Deena Asit Mehta v. Dy. CIT (2022)95 ITR 60 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 22 : Income from house property-Security deposit-Notional addition-Matter remanded.[S.24(a)]

ACIT v. S. N. Damani Infra Pvt. Ltd. (2022)96 ITR 707 / 211 DTR 105 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 22 : Income from house property-Main object warehousing and supply-chain solutions-Earning of rental income sans any amenities to tenants-Not an engagement in systematic business activity of letting out properties-Income to be treated as income from house property. [S. 24(a), 28(i)]

Dy. CIT v. Piramal Enterprises Ltd. (2022) 216 TTJ 802 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 22 : Income from house property-Income from other sources-Ownership was with the assessee despite the sale of property-Rental income assessable as Income from house property-Entitle to statutory deduction of 30%. [S. 24(a), 56]