Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kuni Sahoo (Smt ) v .UOI (2023) 147 taxmann.com 237 ( Orissa )( HC)

S. 194A : Deduction at source – Interest other than interest on securities – Delay in payment of interest – Tax was deducted out of gross amount of interest without spreading over the period of delay – Not justified- Directed to refund the TDS deducted . [S. 2(28A),2(28B), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , S.168, 173, Art , 226 ]

Geeta P.Kamat v .PCIT ( 2023 ) 150 taxmann.com 490 / 455 ITR 23 /BCAJ – Apri – P.45 ( Bom)( HC)

S. 179 : Private company – Liability of directors -Recovery proceedings- Gross neglect , misfeasance or breach of duty -Not proved – Order of the Assessing Officer and order rejecting the revision application was quashed . [ S. 264, Art , 226 ]

ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co. ( 2023)454 ITR 312/ 292 Taxman 566/ 226 DTR 91 / 333 CTR 228 ( Orissa)( HC)/Editorial: SLP of Revenue is dismissed , Asst CIT v. Serajuddin and Co. (2024)463 ITR 698 (SC)

S. 153D : Assessment – Search – Approval – Order passed without obtaining the prior approval is bad in law . [ S. 132 ,153A, 153B]

Aricent Technologies (Holdings ) Ltd v. ACIT (2023) BCAJ – April-. 47 ( Delhi)( HC)

S. 153 : Assessment – Limitation – Assessment barred by limitation- Refund due to the assessee must be paid along with the interest . [ S. 153(3), 153 (4), 254(1) Art, 226 ]

Sunny Rashikbhai Laheri v. ITO (2023) 148 taxmann.com 438 (Guj)( HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – All original notices issued under section 148 of old regime and issued between 1-4-2021 and 30-6-2021 would stand beyond prescribed timeline of six years from end of assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15- Assessment time barred under old regime and could not be issued as per amended provisions. [ S. 148 , 148A(b), 148A(d), 149, 151 , Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, S.3 , Art , 226 ]

CIT ( IT) v. Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd. (2023) 456 ITR 34/ 293 Taxman 385 /332 CTR 221/ 224 DTR 361 (Delhi)( HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment – Assessment order without DIN (document identification number ) has not valid in law – Statutory defects in the assessment order cannot be cured by applying the provision of section 292B of the Act Circular No 19 of 2019 dated 14 -8 -209 ( 2019) 416 ITR 140 (St) –Circular of CBDT is binding on the Revenue – Order of Tribunal quashing the assessment order was affirmed . [ S. 144C, 147, 292B ]

PCIT v. Durgapur Projects Ltd ( 2023) BCAJ- May – P. 47 ( Cal)( HC)

S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation – Compulsory acquisition of a capital asset – Land or building – [S. 2(47), National Highway Act , 1956 ]

CIT v. Machino Techno Sales Ltd ( 2023) BCAJ -May – P. 47 ( Cal)( HC).

S. 45 : Capital gains –Capital asset – Owner – Development agreement – Assessable as capital gains and not as business income .[ S. 28(i) ]

PCIT v. Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd (2023)) 149 taxmann.com 286 ( Cal)( HC)

S.37(1): Business expenditure – Prior period expenditure -Crystallised during the year – Allowable as deduction . [ S. 145 ]

Micro Marbles Pvt Ltd v .ITO ( 2023) The Chamber’s Journal- March P. 120 ( Raj )( HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment –Notice – Material for a reason to believe that income has escaped assessment was not supplied – Reassessment notice was quashed [ S.132(4), 147 Art , 226 ]