Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kuldeep Kumar v. ITO (2022) 213 DTR 201/217 TTJ 632(Asr)(Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposited in the bank-Explanation was not satisfactory-Addition was justified-Income from undisclosed source-Stock valuation-Suppression of stock-Addition was deleted. [S. 69, 145]

Krishna Agarwal (Smt) v. ITO (2022) 215 TTJ 245 / 213 DTR 74 (Jaipur)(Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposited in Bank account-Withdrawal from bank-Proper explanation was furnished-Addition was deleted.

Karishma Sharma (Ms.) v. ITO(IT) (2022) 98 ITR 65 (SN)(Bang) (Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposit in bank-Demonetisation period-Sale of flat-Addition was deleted.

Dy. CIT v. Plasto Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (2022)95 ITR 93 / 218 TTJ 1 (SN)(Kol) (Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Survey-Undervaluation of stocks-Reconciliation statement filed-Addition is not justified. [S. 133A]

VRL Logistics Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)95 ITR 221 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Difference between books of account and Valuation Report-Addition was deleted. [S. 142A]

Astral Properties and Constructions Pvt. Ltd v. ITO (2022)97 ITR 210 (SMC) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Amount received from director-Officer should have verified the return of the director-Source of funds are explained-Addition was deleted. [S. 147, 148]

ITO v. Ramesh Chand (2022)97 ITR 421 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investment-Stock figures and cash position different in statement furnished to the bank and in book of accounts-Statement given to third party not admissible as evidence-CIT(A) is justified in deleting additions. [133(6)]

Vatika Ltd v. ACIT (2022) 100 ITR 23 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Burden of proof on department-Documents impounded in the course of survey-Sale consideration was accepted in the assessment of seller-Addition is not justified. [S.115BBE, 133]

Dy. CIT v. Global Wool Alliance Pvt. Ltd. (2022)100 ITR 12 (SN) (Kol.) (Trib.)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Income from undisclosed sources-Notice returned unserved with the remarks “Not found” or “Left”-Payments were though account payee cheques-tax was deducted at source-Addition is not justified. [S. 133(6)]

Dy. CIT v. BDR Builders & Developers (P) Ltd. (2022) 220 TTJ 921 / (2023) 221 DTR 394/199 ITD 757 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital-Share premium-Deletion of addition is affirmed.