Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Oopal Diamond v. ACIT (2022) 197 ITD 827 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Trading and manufacturing of diamonds-Purchases form tainted dealers-Report of Task Force for Diamond Sector constituted by Ministry of Commerce and Industry-Profit element embedded in value of disputed purchases for diamond manufacturers was to be estimated in range of 1.5 per cent to 4.5 per cent [S. 40A(3), 145]

DCIT v. AYG Realty Ltd. (2022) 197 ITD 448 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Ad-hoc addition of sundry creditors-20 percent of purchases-Discrepancies in balance sheet was reconciled-Addition is not valid. [S. 145]

DCIT v. M.C. Hospital (2022) 197 ITD 706 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Hospital-Demonetization-Sale of medicine and cash in hand-Direction of commissioner to increase declared book profit by 4 per cent of total amount deposited by assessee-Addition is deleted. [S. 145.]

Rajvee Tractors (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 98 ITR 459 / 197 ITD 442 / (2023) 222 TTJ 778/ 225 DTR 121 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Immoveable property-Survey Draft sale deed-Not signed-Application filed by developer before Settlement Commission admitting to have invested certain amount of unaccounted income was not provided for confrontation-Addition is deleted. [S. 133A, 148]

Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies v. ITO (2022) 197 ITD 310 / 98 ITR 29 (SN) (Varanasi)(Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Deposit-Sale proceeds of book and donation-Matter remanded for reverification. [S. 147, 148]

Anuradha Pandey v. ITO (2022) 197 ITD 168 (SMC) (Varanasi) (Trib.)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Investment in purchase of house-Addition restricted to Rs. 1,81,700 only. [S. 144, 147, 148]

P. Prabhu v. ACIT (2022) 197 ITD 821 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Cash deposited-Agricultural income-Addition is not valid. [S. 148]

ITO v. Bhavin Mukeshbhai Patel. (2022) 197 ITD 751 (Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Limited scrutiny-Large investment in property-Wrong mention of the PAN-Addition for purchases as cash credits cannot be made. [S. 143(3)]

Jyoti R. Raut (Mrs.) v. DCIT (2022) 197 ITD 552 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Gift of jewellery from grandmother-Gift received in kind-No cash or cheque-Addition cannot be made as cash credits-Affidavit of grandmother was filed-No occasion for gift to be proved-Exempt from the provisions of section 56(2)(vii) of the Act. [S. 56 (2)(vii]

Vardhman Shipping (P.) Ltd. v. (2022) 197 ITD 250 / 98 ITR 3 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Cash deposit-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer to decide fresh.