Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


G.S. Entertainment v. ACIT (2022) 220 DTR 49 / 220 TTJ 885 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Outstanding sundry creditors shown in the books-Addition cannot be made.

Dy.CIT v. Hyderabad Educational Institutions (P) Ltd (2022) 218 TTJ 487 (Hyd)(Trib)

S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Waiver of interest-Estimate made-No proof for waiver of interest-Deletion of addition is affirmed.

G.S. Entertainment v. ACIT (2022) 220 TTJ 885 / 220 DTR 49 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Loans outstanding in the balance sheet-Addition cannot be made.

Dy.CIT v. Cooper Standard Automotive India P. Ltd. (2022) 98 ITR 59 (SN) (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Capital or revenue-Assets and liabilities of subsidiary absorbed by holding company-Written off-Advance for purchase of tools-Not assessable as business income. [S. 28(iv)]

Rane Engine Valves Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 95 ITR 5 (SN) (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 40A(9) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Bonus to employees-Employees welfare fund-Voluntary retirement Scheme-Allowable as deduction. [S. 10(10C), 37(1)]

Popular Foundations (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 209 DTR 18 / 215 TTJ 260 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Most of payments made on Saturday/Sunday-Payments covered u/r. 6DD-Outside the scope of section 40A(3). [R. 6DD]

Rainbow Promoters (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 95 ITR 232 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Expenditure not debited to profit and loss account-Disallowance cannot be made.

Vikrant Happy Homes (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 218 TTJ 1 (UO) / 138 taxmann.com 559 (Pune) (Trib)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Land dealing-Stock in trade-Cash payment was not claimed as expenditure-Disallowance is not justified. [R. 6DD]

Dy. CIT v. Laxmipathi Balaji Sugar and Distilleries P. Ltd. (2022)100 ITR 58 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 40A(3) :Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Agricultural produce-Payments for purchases of sugarcane-Not disallowable. [R. 6DD(e)

Carmel Softech Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2022)96 ITR 34 (SN) (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 40A(2)(b) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Excessive or unreasonable-Remuneration of directors of Private company-Directors paying taxes at maximum rate-Disallowance of payment in excess of 20 Per Cent. of net Profit not sustainable.