Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


J. S. Gujral Ranjeet Singh v. Dy. CIT (2022) 95 ITR 246 (Delhi)(Trib) Ranjeet Singh v. Dy. CIT (2022) 95 ITR 246 (Delhi)(Trib) Krishna Kumar Pant v. Dy. CIT (2022) 95 ITR 246 (Delhi)(Trib) Sanjee Narayan v. Dy. CIT (2022) 95 ITR 246 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Perquisite-Transfer of shares at face value-Section not existing in statute-Non application of mind-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 2(24)(Iv), 148]

Escorts Finance Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)96 ITR 45 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Reasons–Additional ground-Jurisdiction-Addition made in reassessment proceedings with regard to head for which there was no notice-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 148]

Electronica Machine Tools Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)96 ITR 20 (SN) (Pune) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment-Finding of Commissioner (Appeals) recorded in perfunctory manner-Order not sustainable-Matter restored to Commissioner (Appeals) for adjudication de novo on merits. [S. 148]

Dy. CIT v. Sunflag Iron And Steel Co. Ltd. (2022) 96 ITR 9 (SN.) (Nag) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Change of opinion-Industrial undertakings-Sale of surplus power-Reassessment is not valid. [S. 80IA(4)(iv)]

ACIT v. AbirInfrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (2022)97 ITR 245 (Hyd.) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-No failure of disclosure of facts-Reassessment order is bad in law. [S. 148]

Satyawan v. ITO (2022)97 ITR 16 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Assessment reopened on certain specific grounds-No addition was made on which the reassessment notice was issued-Additions made on other grounds-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 143(3)]

Sanjit Jitendranath Biswas v. ITO (2022)97 ITR 14 (SN) (Surat) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment-No new tangible material to reopen assessment-Reassessment quashed. [S. 148]

Bhupendra K. Pathak v. ITO (2022)97 ITR 28 (SN)/ 218 TTJ 11 / 216 DTR 283 (SMC) (Pune) (Trib)

S. 147: Reassessment Notice-Failure to issue notice-Reassessment void-Issue of notice prior to filing return of no avail. [S. 143(2) 148, 292BB]

Sanjit Jitendranath Biswas v. ITO (2022)97 ITR 14 (SN) (Surat) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-No new material-Cash credits-Income from undisclosed source-Assessee borrowed money from friends and relatives-No evidence to show the receipts as bogus-Reassessment was quashed. [S.68, 148]

Golden Central Foods Products P. Ltd. v. ITO(2022)100 ITR 49 (SN)(Delhi) (Trib)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Unsecured loans-Accommodation entries-In reasons recorded, name of assessee and person from whom bogus accommodation entry different-Name of party and Permanent Account Number in information received also different-Reassessment not valid-Addition as cash credit was deleted. [S. 68, 133(6), 148]