Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sanjay Subhashchand Gupta v. ACIT (2022) 196 ITD 493 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Loan to share holder-Share holding more than 10 percent of shares-Accumulated profits to be considered as on the date of advance of loan-Addition as deemed dividend is justified.

UCO Bank v. JCIT (2022) 195 ITD 9 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 272A : Penalty-Delay in filing TDS return-Delay in filing quarterly statements-Not well acquainted with the procedure of e-filing of TDS return-Penalty was deleted. [S. 201, 272(2)(k), 273B]

DCIT v. Dharmanandan Diamonds (P) Ltd. (2022) 195 ITD 717 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 271G : Penalty-Documents-International transaction-Transfer pricing-Diamond industry-Practical difficulties in furnishing segment-wise details of AE segment and non-AE segment-Penalty not leviable. [S. 92D(3)]

Ajaybhai I Gogia v. ITO (2022) 195 ITD 301 (Rajkot)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Mortgaged property-Auctioned by bank-Capital gains not shown-Guarantor-Difference view-Levy of penalty is not valid-Appeal admitted-Penalty cannot be deleted automatically. [S. 2(47) 45, 48, 260A]

ACIT v. Northern Motors (P.) Ltd. (2022) 195 ITD 207/ 216 TTJ 17(UO) (Amritsar)(Trib.) ACIT v. Acme Forgings (2022) 195 ITD 207/ 216 TTJ 17(UO) (Amritsar) (Trib.) ACIT v. Ashok Kumar Uppal (Dr.) (2022) 195 ITD 207 / 216 TTJ 17(UO) (Amritsar)(Trib.)

S. 268A : Appeal-CBDT Circular-Tax effect from Rs 20 lakhs to Rs 50 lakhs-Enhancing limit-Applies appeals pending before ITAT.

TAQA Neyveli Power Company (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 195 ITD 775 / 220 TTJ 1114 / (2023) 221 DTR 289 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Book profit-New method of accounting-Forex gain or losses-No enquires made by the AO in the assessment proceedings-Revision is held to be valid. [S. 115JB]

Sports Club of Gujarat Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 195 ITD 373 (Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Club entrance fee-Capital receipt-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 4, 143(3)]

Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 195 ITD 188 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Managing Director or Director-Appeal signed by General-Not having valid power of Attorney-Appeal was dismissed in limine [S. 140 (c) Rules, 45, 47]

Dwarka Portfolio (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 195 ITD 491 / 99 ITR 620 (Delhi)(Trib.)/Shastri Buildcon P.Ltd v. ACIT (2022) 99 ITR 620 ( Delhi ) ( Trib) Vavasi Telegence P .Ltd v. ACIT (2022) 99 ITR 620 ( Delhi ) ( Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal- – Private company — Recovery of tax — Name struck down from ROC under section 248 of Companies Act, 2013 Arrears of income-tax due — Appeal to Tribunal does not become infructuous – Name struck down from ROC under section 248 of Companies Act, 2013-Appeal is maintainable. [S. . 68, 179 ,248, 250, Companies Act , 2013 , S.248 , 250 ]]

Desmond Savio Theodore Fernandes v. ITO (2022) 195 ITD 352 / 217 TTJ 84 (UO) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 246A : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Appealable orders-Penalty under section 270A-Appealable before CIT(A) and Not before Appellate Tribunal.[S.246A(1)(q), 253 (1)(a),275]