Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Bharat Fritz Wermer Ltd v. Dy.CIT (2022) 95 ITR 507 (Bang) (Trib)

S .37(1) : Business expenditure-Short fall in inventory written off-Allowable as deduction-Purchase of tools allowable as revenue expenditure-Provision for warranty-Allowable as deduction-Lability for erection and commissioning placed upon shoulders of assessee-Provision at rate of one per cent. to three per cent. determined on basis of past experience-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S. 28(1)]

VRL Logistics Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)95 ITR 221 (Bang)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Prior period expenses-Payments were made when actual bills received after crystallisation of expenditure-Allowable as deduction. [S. 145]

Rainbow Promoters (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)95 ITR 232 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Additional payment to avoid litigation-Deduction not claimed-Disallowance is not warranted.

Sant Tukaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. ITO (2022)96 ITR 72 (SN) (Pune)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Diversion by overriding title-Matter remanded. [S. 40A(2)]

Sant Tukaram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. ITO (2022)96 ITR 72 (SN)(Pune) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Ceremony expenses-Disallowance at 30 Per Cent is held to be justified.

M. D. Noorudin Zariwala v. CIT(Appeals) (2022) 96 ITR 43 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Travelling expenses-Personal use-Disallowance of 20 Per Cent. for personal use is held to be justified.

M. D. Noorudin Zariwala v. CIT(Appeals) (2022) 96 ITR 43 (SN) (Mum) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Payment to Mosque for free lunch to Assessee’s employees-Mosque not under control of assessee-Free Lunch not provided exclusively to Labourers of assessee-Not allowable as deduction.

Welkin Telecom Infra (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)96 ITR 475 (Kol) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Subscription paid to different committees and associations in local vicinity-Allowable as deduction-Excess amount paid as written off-Matter remanded.

City Corporation Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 96 ITR 246 (Pune) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Interest on debentures or compulsorily convertible debentures-Added to work in progress-Builder-Excess interest is required to be added back proportionately to total income as and when corresponding amount of work-in-progress reversed on sale of Flats/Plots [S. 145]

BGR Energy Systems Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 96 ITR 625 (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Accrued or Contingent Liability-Provision for warranty-Ad-hoc basis-Not deductible.