S. 147 : Reassessment -Notice after six years-Sanction-Notice dated 30-3-2021 issued under old provision after coming into effect of new provision from 1-4-2021 -UOI v. v. Ashish Agarwal(2022) 444 ITR 1 (SC) – Notice and subsequent orders and proceedings are quashed. [S. 148, 151, Art,226]
S. 147 : Reassessment -Residential Status -Resident or non-resident -Service of notice on chartered Accountant – Reassessment notice was held to be valid- Interest- Levy of interest -Automatic -Working in ITNS 150 forming part of assessment order was proper -Sikkim -Commission -Burden not discharged -Round tripping of funds -Liable to tax in India. [S. 2(35), 5, 6(3)(ii), 131, 142(1), 143(2), 148, 234A, 282]
S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years-Speculative transactions-loss of cancellation of forward contract-Change of opinion-No new material -SLP of Revenue dismissed. [S. 43(5), 148, Art. 136, 226]
S. 147 : Reassessment -After the expiry of four years – Specific query in the course of assessment proceedings -Expenditure on cost of samples – Advertisement and sales promotion- Change of opinion -SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 37(1), Explanation, 148, Indian Medical Council (Professional, Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, Art. 136]
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Book profit-Revision was dropped-Sanction for reassessment was without application of mind-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed.- SLP of Revenue was dismissed. [S. 148, 151, 263, Art. 136, 226]
S. 147 : Reassessment -After the expiry of four years -No failure to disclose material facts -Change of opinion – Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed by the High Court was affirmed. [S. 143(3), 148, Art. 136, 226]
S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice after six years-Notice issued prior to 1-4-2021 more than six years after expiry of Assessment year – High Court quashed notice and orders- SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 148, Art. 136, 226]
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Writ-Territorial Jurisdiction of Court -Doctrine of forum non convenience – Assessment order -Cause of action – Situs of Assessing Officer would be determinative of Jurisdiction of High Court -Complexity of Legal issues -Matter referred to larger Bench. [S. 143(3), 144B(1)(xxxii), 156, 271AACC (1), Art. 226]
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Failure to follow the procedure-Certain observations of High Court is expunged-Liberty to Department to seek review in light of omission of section 144B(9) of the Act. [S. 144B(9), Art. 136, 226]
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment –Failure to follow procedure -Subsequent omission of provision -Judgment of High Court set aside and matter remanded to the High Court to consider effect of omission of provision. [S. 119, 144B (9), Art, 136, 226]