Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Ashraf Alibhai Nathani v. ACIT (2023) 452 ITR 292 / 211 DTR 336 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Sale of shares-Oversight of the Assessing officer-No failure to discloses material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed. [S. 54EC, 148, 153A, Art. 226]

Oracle Financial Services Software Ltd. v. ACIT (No. 2) (2023) 452 ITR 279 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

JCIT v. Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 452 ITR 224 / 291 Taxman 526/(2024) 336 CTR 247 (SC) Editorial : Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT(2021) 439 ITR 571 (Mad)(HC) is affirmed.

S. 147 : Reassessment-Change of opinion-Facts available in the original assessment proceedings-Reassessment is not valid. [S. 143(3), 148, Art. 136]

ACIT v. Oracle Financial Services Software Ltd. (2023) 452 ITR 280 (SC) Editorial: Oracle Financial Services Software Ltd. v. ACIT (No. 2) (2023) 452 ITR 279 (Bom)(HC), affirmed.

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Assessee is not required to state law which department feels attracted. [S. 148, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Kandla Steel Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 452 ITR 22 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Rejection of books of account-Estimation of profit 0.5 per cent-Question of fact. [S. 145(3), 260A]

Pfizer Healthcare India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 452 ITR 187/334 CTR 944 / 151 taxmann.com 200 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Draft assessment order-Limitation-Direction of Commissioner does not extend limitation. [S. 92CA(3), 144A, 153]

Arista Infrastructure v. ITO (2023) 452 ITR 172/292 Taxman 226 /335 CTR 848 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Prior to 1-4-2021-Order passed without notice-cum-Draft assessment order-No opportunity of hearing-Order of assessment was not valid-High Court-Territorial Jurisdiction-Part of cause of action arising in a particular area-High Court of that area has jurisdiction. [S. 143(3), Art. 226]

Roshan Lal Sanchiti v. PCIT (2023) 452 ITR 229/ 292 Taxman 69 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Roshan Lal Sanchiti (2023) 150 taxmann.com 227 (Raj)(HC)(D.B. I.TA. No. 47 of 2018 dt. 30-10-2018 (Raj)(HC), affirmed.

S. 132(4) : Search and seizure-Statement on oath-Income from undisclosed sources-Income surrendered during search-Retraction of statement after eight months-Statement cannot be discarded. [S. 131, 132, Art. 136]

Munjaal Boutique Homes Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2023) 452 ITR 8 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 132 : Search and seizure-Release of seized documents-Directions issued for the release of documents pertaining to assessee. [Art. 226]

PCIT v. Atria Power Corporation Ltd. (2023) 452 ITR 290 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial: SLP is granted to the Revenue, PCIT v. Atria Power Corporation Ltd (2023) 452 ITR 412 (St)(SC)

S. 115JB : Book profit-Banking company-Provision is not applicable.