Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Dinesh Kumar Bansal (HUF) (2022) 214 DTR 11/(2023) 335 CTR 577 (Cal (HC)

S. 260A : Appeal – High Court – Condonation of delay – Substantial justice – Every single day’s delay must be explained does not mean that a pedantic approach should be made. When substantial justice and technical consideration are pitted against each other, cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred. [S. 254(1), Limitation Act , S. 5, Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act , 2020 , S. 3 ]

Headmaster, Government Upper Primary School v. ITO (2022) 218 DTR 38/(2023) 334 CTR 337 (Ker)( HC)

S.234E: Fee-Default in furnishing the statements- Non-filing of TDS statement – Effective from 1-6-2015 – Levy of late fee invalid [ S. 200A, Art 226 ]

Equity Intelligence India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 324 CTR 563 / 209 DTR 412 ( Ker )( HC)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake -Mistake apparent from the record – Appeal – Refusal to consider circular – Writ petition was dismissed [ S. 246A ,Art , 226 ]

Indus Towers Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 214 DTR 70 / 326 CTR 885 (Delhi)( HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Lack of jurisdiction of AO – Order u/s 148A(d) and notice u/s 148 quashed [ S. 148, 148A(d) Art, 226 ]

Sambathiraj Vijayrai v ITO ( 2022) 328 CTR 827 / 215 DTR 449 (Mad)( HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Failure to issue proper show cause notice – Principle of natural justice – Order set aside [S. 148A(b) ,151 , Art .226 ]

Jindal forgings v. Income-tax Department (2022) 216 DTR 449 / 143 taxmann.com 263 (Jharkhand)( HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Principle of natural justice – Granted three days to file reply – Order was quashed. [ S. 148A(b) 148A(d), Art , 226 ]

Indus Towers Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 214 DTR 70 / 326 CTR 885 (Delhi)( HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Lack of jurisdiction of AO – Order u/s 148A(d) and notice u/s 148 quashed [ S. 148, 148A(d) Art, 226 ]

Harsh Bhavesh Patel (Smt) v. NFAC (2022) 327 CTR 598 /216 DTR 217 (Karn)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Faceless Assessment – Personal hearing through video conference – Opportunity of hearing denied – Matter remand – [ S. 144B , 147 , 148, Art , 226 ]

Excel Commodity & Derivative (P) LTD. v UOI (2022) 328 CTR 715 / 217 DTR 463 ( Cal )( HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice -No reasoning or any discussion found on the contention raised – Order set a side for passing a speaking order. [ S. 148A(d), Art , 226 ]

Excel Commodity & Derivative (P) Ltd v. UOI (2022) 328 CTR 710/ 217 DTR 458 / ( 2023) 455 ITR 341 ( Cal )( HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Order passed on the different ground – Contrary to CBDT Circular dated Ist August 2022- Order was quashed. [ S. 148A(b) ,148(a)(d), 151, Art , 226 ]