S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Manufacturing of compressors and mining & production tools-Four types of cost-TPO was not justified in considering only two expenses, namely, manufacturing and marketing as contributing to earning of profits. [S. 92CA]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Engineering design services-Separate segmental accounts-Adjustment made by TPO was deleted. [S. 92CA]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Technical service fee-Relief granted for AY. 2004-05 was not challenged-Addition was deleted. [S. 92CA]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Aggregation of transaction-justified in segregating international transaction of professional charges to be processed independent of other international transactions-Allowability of expenditure-Matter remanded. [S. 92CA]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Interest on receivables-Reduction of credit period to 30 days from 90 days by Dispute Resolution Panel-Service agreement with associated enterprise amended to 90 days-TPO to consider 90 days-Matter Remanded. [S. 92B (1)]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Corporate Guarantee Computation of commission at 0.5 percent-Justified [S. 92B]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Guarantee commission-Yield spread approach-Adjustments made by the TPO was deleted.[S. 92CA]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-AMP expenses-Adjustments-Not justified-Purchase-Imports-Gross margins of assessee were much more than gross margins of comparable companies chosen by TPO, no adjustment to ALP was to be made in respect of import of finished goods. [S. 92CA]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparables, functional similarity-Least complex entity to a transaction should be adopted as a tested party-Composite set of books of account-Aggregation of transactions-Transfer pricing adjustment should be restricted only to international transactions. [S.92CA]

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Methods for determination of-Resale price method-International transaction is not that of purchase by an Indian entity, then RPM cannot be applied-Brand building expenses-Employees cost and operating and administrative expenses incurred for year in question and claimed as deduction in entirety in year alone could not be treated as Brand building expenses. [R. 10B(1)(b)]