Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT (C) v. Ambe Tradecorp (P.) Ltd. (2023) 290 Taxman 471 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of loan transactions were established-Notice issued under section 133(6) was responded-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition was affirmed. [S. 133(6)]

PCIT v. Attire Designers (P.) Ltd. (2023)455 ITR 697 / 290 Taxman 551 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Sundry creditors-Bogus purchases-Sundry creditors-Credit sales-Books of account not rejected-Sales accepted as genuine-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition was affirmed.

PCIT (C) v. E-City Projects Lucknow (P.) Ltd. (2023) 290 Taxman 281 / 223 DTR 468 / 332 CTR 857 (Orissa)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Loans-Search-Accommodation entries-Through banking channels-Deletion of addition by the Tribunal was affirmed. [S. 132]

P.R. Ganapathy v. Dy. CIT (2023) 290 Taxman 68/ 335 CTR 565 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-NRI gifts-Search and seizure-Denial by donors-Addition was as cash was affirmed. [S. 132]

Bindu Premanandh v. CIT (2023) 290 Taxman 457 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Payments were made before the sale of an original asset-Test ought to be when construction of the residential house was completed-Matter remanded to CIT(A). [S. 45]

PCIT v. L.G.W. LTD. (2023) 290 Taxman 250 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Contractors-Delay in filing Form 26Q-Filed before the competition of assessment-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition was affirmed. [S. 194C, Rule 31A]

PCIT v. Attire Designers (P.) Ltd. (2023) 455 ITR 697/ 290 Taxman 551 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Interest payment to DGFT on account of excess availment of export incentive is not penal nature-Allowable as business expenditure.

CIT v. Bannari Amman Sugars Ltd. (2023) 290 Taxman 311 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Payment to State Power Corp. towards the construction of a transmission line and other supporting work-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

Nitesh Housing Developers (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 290 Taxman 474 (Kar.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Premium paid to allottee on redemption of debentures-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

PCIT v. Amadeus India (P.) Ltd. (2023) 290 Taxman 201 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No exempt income received during the year-Disallowance cannot be made. [R. 8D]