Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Subex Ltd v. Addl.CIT (2022) 145 taxmann.com 176 (Karn.)(HC) Editorial: SLP of Revenue dismissed, Addl. CIT v. Subex Ltd. (2023) 290 Taxman 102 (SC)

S. 10AA : Special economic zones-Export turnover-Telecommunication expenses were to be excluded from export turnover.

CIT (IT) v. New Skies Satellite BV (2023) 290 Taxman 170 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Non-resident-Providing satellite transmission services is not royalty-Order of Tribunal affirmed-DTAA-India-Netherland. [S. 260A, Art. 12]

K.M. Bopanna (HUF) v. Dy. CIT (2023) 290 Taxman 298 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 2(14)(iii) : Capital asset-Agricultural land-Mango, orchard-Situated beyond 8 kms. of City corporation-Sale proceeds of land is entitled to exemption. [S. 45]

JM Financial Asset Management Ltd v. DCIT ( Mum)(Trib) www.itatonline .org

S.147: Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – Mutual fund Spill over expenses, offer expenses, SEBI Registration fee – On the same set of facts reassessment order is bad in law – Assessing Officer has no power to review the assessment order – Order of reassessment was quashed [ S. 148 ]

Jetkool Exports India v. NFAC ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline .org .

S. 40(b)(v) : Amounts not deductible – Partner – Remuneration – Supplementary deed operates retrospectively if the deed is in accordance with the law – Disallowance of remuneration was deleted [ S. 40(b)(ii) ]

Xiaomi Technology India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 451 ITR 58 / 330 ITR 113 / 221 DTR 225 // 291 Taxman 315 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 281B : Provisional attachment-Mere apprehension that huge demand would be made is not sufficient-Tangible reasons are required-Grant of approval cannot be mechanical-Approval for attachment cannot be given without considering facts. [Art. 226]

Rajinder Kumar v. State. (2023) 451 ITR 338 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Failure to produce accounts and documents-Admission regarding Foreign Bank account after an investigation by department-Revised return was filed after issue of notice-Failure to disclose foreign account opened in year 1991 when the assessee was 55 years of age-Cannot take benefit of circular recommending any prosecution where the assessee is aged 70 years or more at time of offence-Launching of prosecution is justified. [S. 132, 153A, 271, 271(1)(b), 274, 276C(1), 276D, 277, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 245(2), Central Board Of Direct Taxes Instruction No. 5051, Dated 7-2-1991]

PCIT v. Rishikesh Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. (2023)451 ITR 108 (Delhi)(HC) PCIT v. Rishikesh Properties Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 451 ITR 108 (Delhi)(HC) PCIT v. Rupa Promoters Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 451 ITR 108 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 275 : Penalty-Bar of limitation-Limitation-Limitation starts from the date of assessment when the Assessing Officer initiates penalty proceedings and not from the date of sanction for penalty proceedings. [S. 271D, 275(1)(c)]

PCIT v. Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd. (2023) 451 ITR 208 / 330 CTR 400 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: Order in Bechtel India Pvt. Ltd. v. Add CIT (2021) 86 ITR 544 (Delhi)(Trib), affirmed.

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-International transactions-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Question of fact. [S. 92C]

Sark Cable Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2023) 451 ITR 167 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 234E : Fee-Default in furnishing the statements-Levy of the late fee applicable only from 1-6-2015. [S. 200A(1), Art. 226]