Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Jugal Kishore Paliwal v. JCIT (2022) 446 ITR 515 / 213 DTR 121 / 326 CTR 361 (Chhattisgarh)(HC) Saraswati Agro Industries (2022) 446 ITR 515 / 213 DTR 121 / 326 CTR 361 (Chhattisgarh)(HC) Vidhya Nagdeo (Smt.) v. JCIT (2022) 446 ITR 515 / 213 DTR 121 / 326 CTR 361 (Chhattisgarh)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Transactions discovered to be non-genuine by Income-Tax Officer (Inv)-Notice valid-Sanction-Order of sanction to be tested along with reasons for notice. [S. 131A, 148, 151, 282A, Art. 226]

Jindal Naturecare Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 446 ITR 187 / 215 DTR 113/(2022) 337 CTR 221 (Karn.)(HC) Jindal Aluminium Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022) 446 ITR 187 / 215 DTR 113/ (2024) 337 CTR 221 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Donation to Institution-Survey-Subsequent withdrawal of approval with retrospective effect-Notice of reassessment is valid. [S. 35(1)(ii), 133A, 148, Art.226]

International Seaport Dredging Pvt. Ltd. v. NFAC (2022) 446 ITR 246 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Principles of Natural justice-Order passed without giving adequate time to respond to show-cause notices-Order set aside-Matter remanded. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Shrikant Phulchand Bhakkad (HUF) v. JCIT (2022) 446 ITR 250 / 213 DTR 361 / 328 CTR 64 / 287 Taxman 440 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Bogus transaction-Information from investigation wing-Limited scrutiny-Futures and options-Loss was set off against normal business-Reassessment notice valid. [S. 43(5)(d), 133(6), 148, 151, Art. 226]

Rochana Agarwal v. ACIT (2022) 446 ITR 529 / 287 Taxman 260/ 218 DTR 501/ 329 CTR 270 (All.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-Transactions disclosed found subsequently to be bogus-Notice valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Renault Nissan Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. NEAC (2022) 446 ITR 555 / 220 DTR 405/(2023) 335 CTR 462(Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Notice-Order of reassessment without considering objections-Not valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Distributors India (South) v. UOI.(No. 2) (2022)446 ITR 177 (2023) 332 CTR 574 (All.)(HC) Editorial : Distributors India (South) v. UOI (NO. 1) (2022) 446 ITR 163 / 288 Taxman 346 / (2023) 332 CTR 585(All)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Failure To Disclose material facts-Not disclosing receipts under Section 194J and reimbursement of expenses-Proper recording of satisfaction-Decision could not be reviewed-Notice could not be declared invalid.[S. 148 ,260A, Code of Civil Procedure, Order 47, Rule 1, Art. 226]

Distributors India (South) v. UOI (NO. 1) (2022) 446 ITR 163 / 288 Taxman 346 /(2023) 332 CTR 585(All.)(HC) Editorial : Review petition dismissed, Distributors India (South) v. UOI.(No. 2) (2022) 446 ITR 177 /(2023) 332 CTR 574(All.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Failure To Disclose material facts-Not disclosing receipts under Section 194J and reimbursement of expenses-Proper recording of satisfaction-Notice valid. [S. 148, 151, 194C, 194J, Form 26AS]

Ambuj Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. PRCIT (2022) 446 ITR 294 / 287 Taxman 490/ 219 DTR 65 / 329 CTR 205 (All.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-False disclosure is not true disclosure-Shell companies-Share premium-Share capital-Radha Fincom Pvt Ltd-Information from investigation wing-Bogus share capital-Notice valid-Writ petition was dismissed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. NFAC (2022) 446 ITR 734 / 287 Taxman 40// 220 DTR 105/ 329 DTR 502 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Principles of natural justice-Precedent-Decision of Supreme Court binding on all Courts and all authorities-Appellate Tribunal-Decision of Tribunal is binding on all authorities. [S. 254(1), Art. 226]