Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Qmax Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. (Bom.)(HC)(UR)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Department had withdrawn the Appeal that was pending before the Tribunal based on a Circular No 3 of 2018 dt. 11-7-2018 (2018) 405 ITR 29(St)-Later the Circular was amended and exceptions were added-Department filed miscellaneous application to recall the withdrawn appeal-The Writ petition of Revenue was dismissed. [Art. 226]

Directi Services Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (Bom.)(HC)(UR)

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Collection agent in respect of monies receivable from Indian customers by its Associated enterprise a UAE registered entity-Failure to deduct tax at source-Oder was quashed without making any observations on the merits of the case-Assessing Officer was directed to pass fresh order after giving a reasonable opportunity to the assessee-DTAA-India-UAE. [S. 133(6), 201(1), 201(1A), Art. 5(4), Art. 226]

Johnson and Jonson Private Limited v. DCIT (2022) 213 DTR 340/ 326 CTR 868(Bom.)(HC)

S. 151 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Sanction for issue of notice-Approval obtained for issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act is not in accordance with the mandate of section 151-Sanction from Additional Commissioner of Income-tax and not from the PCIT-Notice issued is bad in law hence quashed. [S. 148, Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, Art. 226]

Dilip Bhagirathmal Jiwrajka v. DCIT (Bom.)(HC)(UR) Ashok Bhagirathmal Jiwrajka  v. DCIT (Bom.)(HC)(UR) Surendra  Bhagirathmal Jiwrajka v. DCIT (Bom.)(HC)(UR)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Errors in Column No.8 and 9 of the Form for re-opening-DCIT,PCIT,CIT to explain the basis on which re-opening was approved when the form had errors-wrong amount was mentioned as income originally assessed-Safeguards provided in Sections 147 and 151 were lightly treated by the Officers-Notice was quashed. [S. 147, 148, Art. 226]

TLG India Private Ltd. (As successor to ‘Solutions Integrated Marketing Services Private Ltd.) v. NFAC  ( 2019) 219 DTR 383 / ( 2023) 330 CTR 207 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Notice was sent to the original assessee despite various communications sent to department informing of the amalgamation and non-existence of the assessee-Notice issued to a non-existing entity is bad in law-Notice was quashed. [S. 147, Art. 226]

Davariya Brothers Private Limited v. ACIT (Bom)(HC) (UR)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Recorded reasons not provided-Non-application of mind by the Assessing officer-There is no section 148D under the Income-tax Act-Notice and order quashed. [S. 147, 148D, 151, Art. 226]

 Sai Enterprises v.  UOI (Bom.)(HC)(UR)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Reasons for reopening has blanks-notice not digitally signed-Petitioner has not filed its objections to the notice-Petitioner directed to file its objections within two weeks-The Assessing Officer shall grant a personal hearing and pass an assessment order. [S. 147, 151, Art. 226]

Ashok Devichand Jain v. UOI (Bom.)(HC)(UR)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Income above 20 Lakhs-ITO has no jurisdiction to issue notice-Notice should be issued by AC / DC as per CBDT instruction No.1/2011. [S. 147, 151, Art. 226]

Implenia Services and Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (Bom.)(HC) (UR)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Notice issued to non-existing entity-Notice invalid-Notice could not be corrected u/s. 292B of the Act. [S. 147, 292B, Art. 226]

Starent Network (India) Private Limited v. DCIT (Bom.)(HC)(UR)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Change of opinion-Share capital-Share premium-Reasons that the amounts allegedly received from issuing of shares were its own funds-Reopening notice is bad on account of a change of opinion. [S. 148, Art. 226]