Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dy. CIT (Inv.) v. Xiongwei Li (2022)448 ITR 193 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 275B : Offences and prosecutions-Search and seizure-Facility to inspect books of account-Documents-Wilful attempt to evade tax-Denial of adequate facility to the authorised officers empowered under section 132 of the Act were non-cognizable and bailable-Chief executive of the company a Chinees national with jo assets or family in India-Look-Out Circular-No extradition treaty with China-Individual being flight risk-Additional directions issued to deposit Rs 5 crores. [S. 132, 123(9B), 276C, 278B]

H.D.F.C. Bank v. State of Bihar (2022) 448 ITR 103 (Pat.)(HC)/Editorial : Order of High Court is quashed , HDFC Bank Ltd. v State of Bihar (2024)468 ITR 650 / 167 taxmann.com 600 (SC)

S. 275A : Offences and prosecutions-Prohibitory order-Contravention-Power to quash first information report-First information report could not be quashed. [S. 132(3), Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S. 155(2)]

PCIT v. Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 448 ITR 717 /(2023) 290 Taxman 374/ 330 CTR 623/ 222 DTR 191 (SC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Limitation-Delay of 86 days-Delay was condoned-High Court directed to dispose of appeals on merits.

Lion Dates Impex (P.) Ltd. v. Chairman, Income-Tax Settlement Commission (No. 2) (2022)448 ITR 436/ 220 DTR 221 /141 taxmann.com 273 / (2023) 331 CTR 351 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Decision of single judge in Lion Dates Impex (P.) Ltd. v Chairman, Income-Tax Settlement Commission And Others (No. 1) (2022)448 ITR 422/ 220 DTR 369 /(2023) 331 CTR 398 (Mad)(HC)), set aside.

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Procedure-Procedure laid down must be followed-Order not following procedure-Not valid-Writ petition pending when Settlement Commission was abolished-Petition to be considered by Interim Board. Principles of natural justice-legal maxim “nemo judex in sua causa debet esse”, No one can be a judge in his own case. [S. 245D(5), 245A, 245B, Art. 226]

Graphite India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 448 ITR 292 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 245 : Refunds-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable-Appeal pending-Entitled to refund of amount adjusted in excess of 20 Per Cent-No order passed either accepting or rejecting–Entitled to refund of amount adjusted in excess of 20 Per Cent. [S. 156, 220(6), 227, Art. 226]

Pradeep Alexander v. TRO (2022) 448 ITR 720 / 2023) 334 CTR 439 (Mad.)(HC) Academic Charitable Environmental and Research Foundation v. TRO (2022)448 ITR 720/ (2023) 334 CTR 439 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Certificate to Tax Recovery Officer-Attachment and sale of immovable property-Time limit-Order of attachment twenty five years after assessment years-Barred by limitation-Notice of attachment was quashed. [S. 2(25), 2(44), 117, 222, 281B, Schedule II, R, 2, 4, 16, 68B, Art. 226]

Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT(IT) (2022) 448 ITR 268 / 215 DTR 289 / 327 CTR 289 / 288 Taxman 699 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Double taxation avoidance-Reimbursement of employees of American company-Provisions of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement are more beneficial than the provisions of the Act, it is the Agreement that should be treated as the law that requires to be followed and applied-Certificate for deduction at lower rate or nil deduction-The application under section 195 is at the instance of the person making the payment, while the application under section 197 is at the instance of the recipient-DTAA-India-USA. [S. 40(a))(ia), 90(2), 195(2), 197, Art. 12]

Sunil Kumar Sharma v. Dy. CIT (2022) 448 ITR 485 / 220 DTR 241 /(2023) 332 CTR 72 (Karn.)(HC) Kandaswamy Rajendran v. Dy. CIT (2022)448 ITR 485/ 220 DTR 241/ (2023) 332 CTR 72 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Books of account-Loose sheets and diaries do not Constitute to books of account-Assessment based only on evidence available in loose sheets and diaries-Not valid-Transfer of case-Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard–Existence of alternate remedy-Not an absolute bar on issue of Writ. [S. 132, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, S. 34, Art. 226]

Underwater Services Co. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 448 ITR 691 / 209 DTR 476 / 326 CTR 208 (Bom.)(HC) Samson Maritime Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 448 ITR 691 / 209 DTR 476 / 326 CTR 208 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-Assessment of undisclosed Income-Notice should be based on material seized under Section 132 or documents requisitioned under Section 132A-Notice was quashed. [S. 132, 132A, Art. 226]

Ideal Associates v. ACIT (2022) 448 ITR 260 / 146 taxmann.com 225(Bom.)(HC)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Application of mind by sanctioning authority-Notice valid. [S. 147, 148, Art. 226]