Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kyori Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 651 (Hyd.) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Transferred part of converted capital asset into stock-in-trade-failure to make enquiry-Revision is valid. [S. 45, 48]

Reliance Payment Solutions Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 194 ITD 492 / 217 TTJ 153 / 212 DTR 297 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Higher rate of depreciation-Non-mentioning of specific reasons for accepting explanation of assessee by AO in assessment order-Revision is not valid. [S. 32]

Swasthya Sewa Sansthan v. CIT(E) (2022) 194 ITD 444 (Kol.) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Hospitals-Philanthropic purposes-Interest income from investment-Incurred only 12 per cent of receipts for philanthropic purposes and accumulated 88 per cent of its receipts-Eligible for exemption-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 10(23C)(iiiae)]

Shergil Harjit v. PCIT (2022) 194 ITD 218 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Bank deposit-Senior citizens-Cash deposited out of past savings-All explanations and documents from assessee had been scrutinized and examined by Assessing Officer, in such scenario order of assessment could not be held to be erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue. [S. 68]

Automark Industries (India) (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 194 ITD 172 (Nagpur)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Specific domestic transaction-Order passed without referring domestic transaction to TPO-Section 92BA(i) was unconditionally omitted without a saving clause-Revision is not valid. [S. 92BA(i)]

Shree Naurang Godavari Entertainment Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 431 / 216 TTJ 853 / 212 DTR 129 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Ex parte order-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer to do deno assessment. [S. 143 (3)]

Elgi Ultra Industries Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 698 / 215 TTJ 539/ 209 DTR 177(Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 244A : Refunds-Interest on refunds-Delay in payment of interest on account of technical reasons-Entitle to interest only interest on income tax refund due to assessee upto date of payment.

Deccan Charters (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (TDS) (2022) 194 ITD 59 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 221 : Collection and recovery-Penalty-Chartered flying of small aircrafts-Tax in default-Financial difficulties-Not remitting the tax deducted at source. [S. 195]

Jayantilal D. Ray v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 713 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 207 : Advance tax-Salary income-Tax deducted at source-Not liable to pay advance tax. [S. 143(1), 192, 207(2), 208, 234B, 234C]

Robert Bosch Engineering and Business Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 340 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Deducted at the time of payment Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Once an amount is disallowed for non-deduction of tax, it cannot be subject to TDS provisions again so as to make assessee liable to interest under section 201(1A) of the Act. [S. 40(ia), 40(a)(ia), 201(1), 201(IA)]