Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


K. V. Sridhar v. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 450 / 220 DTR 348/(2023) 221 TTJ 676 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Gift-Capital or revenue-Consideration-Suit properties-Sum received by for giving up his rights to contest will could not be said to have been received without consideration and hence, could not have been brought to tax-Sum received is capital receipt cannot be taxed as capital gains. [S. 4, 45, 56(2)(vii)(a)]

Vandana Maruti Pathare. V. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 753 (SMC) (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 54B : Capital gains-Land used for agricultural purposes-Purchase of land-Failure to purchase the land in her name-Not eligible to claim exemption. [S. 45]

Futuristic Diagnostic Imaging Centre (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 532 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-Conversion of asset into stock-in-trade-Land converted in to stock in trade-Capital gains was to be computed upto date of conversion into stock-in-trade and for period thereafter sales realization of stock-in-trade over fair market value of land was to be assessed as business income. [S. 28(i), 45(2)]

Godha Realtors (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 31 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains-immovable property-Agreement to sell-transfer-Possession was not given-Not liable to capital gains tax. [S. 2(47)]

Ramachandra Naveen v. ADIT (2022) 194 ITD 434 (Bang.) (Trib.)/ Abdul Hassan Risvi v. ACIT (2022) 220 TTJ 813/ 220 DTR 313 (Chennai )( Trib)/GSD Constructions Indore (P) Ltd. .v. Dy. CIT ( 2022) 217 TTJ 33 (UO) / 141 taxmann.com 69 ( Indore ) (Trib)/Aroon Facilitation Management Service(P) Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2022) 215 TTJ 722 (SMC) (Delhi)(Trib)/Vinko Auto Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 209 DTR 201/215 TTJ 405 (Asr) (Trib) / Dy. CIT v .G4S Facility Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 99 ITR 206 (Delhi)( Trib) /Neev Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. A CIT (2022)97 ITR 38 (Trib) (SN) (Mum) ( Trib ) /ACIT v .New Saravana Stores Brahmandamai (2022)95 ITR 7 (SN)(Chennai ) ( Trib) /Electrical India & ors v. ACIT (2022) 220 TTJ 813/ 220 DTR 313 (Chennai )( Trib)/.Electrical India & ors v. ACIT (2022) 220 TTJ 813/ 220 DTR 313 (Chennai )( Trib) / Kalpesh Synthetics(P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT ( 2022) 213 DTR 217 / 217 TTJ 513 / 137 taxmann.com 475 / 96 ITR 690 / 195 ITD 142 (Mum)(Trib)/ Arihant Automobiles. v. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 509 (Jabalpur) (Trib.) Shree Shyam Designs (P.) Ltd. v. ADIT (2022) 194 ITD 528 (Bang.)(Trib.) Kanthi Agency Networks. v. ADIT (2022) 194 ITD 581 (Bang.) (Trib.) Paramjeet Singh. v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 685 (Chandigarh) (Trib.) Punjab Bevel Gears Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 756 (Delhi) (Trib.) Raj Kumar v. ITD CPC, (2022) 194 ITD 802 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Provident Fund contributions-Employee’s share of contribution is made on or before due date for furnishing return of income under section 139(1), assessee would be entitled to claim deduction-Explanatory memorandum to Finance Act, 2021 proposing amendment in section 36(1)(va) as well as section 43B is applicable prospectively with effect from 1-4-2021. [S. 36(1)(va), 139]

Environs Management (Bangalore) (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 67 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Employees’ contribution of PF and ESI before due date of filing return-Entitled to deduction. [S. 36(1)(va), 139(1)]

DCIT v. Kunnam Granite Works (2022) 194 ITD 238 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 43(5) : Speculative transaction-Trading in derivatives-Hedging contract with its bankers to minimize possible fluctuation in foreign currency-Not speculation loss-Allowable as business or business expenditure. [S. 28(i), 37(1)]

DCIT v. Vinod Arora (2022) 194 ITD 605 (Amritsar)(Trib.)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Payment was made by way of legal tender i.e. Indian currency, said payments were covered by exception contemplated in rule 6DD(b)-Disallowance is not valid [R.6DD(b)] and, therefore, same could not be disallowed under section 40A(3).

Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 641 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ii) : Amounts not deductible-Rates or tax-Education cess cannot be equated as tax or surcharge-Allowable as business.

Shri Shanmugar Services v. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 747 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Contractors/sub-contractors Custom House agent, to shipping companies/CFS agents-Failure to deduct tax at source-Disallowance is valid. [S. 194C]