Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


M.V.A. Seetharama Raju v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 359 / 97 ITR 714 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Tax deducted by applying wrong provision of the Act-Lower rate-No disallowance can be made. [S. 201(1), 201(IA)]

TUV Rheinland NIFE Academy (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 78 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Interest on Bank loans-Interest paid on bank loans is not liable to TDS deduction and hence disallowance is not called for-Matter remanded for verification. [S. 37(1)]

Ceequence Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 693 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Royalty-Payments to foreign company for rendering internet private line services-Ambiguity in definition of royalty-Disallowance is not valid-DTAA-India-USA. [S. 9(1)(vi), 9(1))(vii), 195, Art. 12]

PPN Power Generating Co. (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 623 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Repair and maintenance services-Reimbursement of expenses-No TDS is deductible-DTAA-India-Japan. [S. 9(1)(vii), 19, Art. 12]

ITO v. Terapanth Foods Ltd. (2022) 194 ITD 614 (Rajkot) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Shipping business-As per charging section 172, no liability arises for payment of tax by non-resident receiving payment on time charter basis. [S. 172, 195]

Vanderlande Industries (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 229/ 99 ITR 585 / 219 TTJ 493 216 DTR 289 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Royalty-For use or right to use of overall ICT infrastructure-Liable to deduct tax at source-Disallowance is justified DTAA-India-Netherlands. [S. 9(1)(vi)(b), 195, Art. 12]

DCIT v. Omni Active Health Technologies Ltd. (2022) 194 ITD 783 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Legal fees-Defending lawsuit filed against it for infringement of patent right-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 641 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Expenditure under (CSR)-Capital or revenue-Allowable as business expenditure.

Bharath Wind Farm Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 636 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Carbon Emission reduction-Offered as income in earlier years-Entitle to claim as expenditure if ultimately receipts could not be realized. [S. 4]

E-Land Systems (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 541 (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Setting up of business-Business of providing information technology application management support services.