Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Ashdan Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 93 ITR 6 (SN) (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Share premium-Report of expert-PCIT is not entitled to reject valuation report in absence of report from another expert. [S. 56(2)(vii)]

Anil Rambhai Mevad v. PCIT (2022) 93 ITR 8 (SN)/)/ 215 TTJ 428/ 209 DTR 298 (Ahd.)(Trib.) Deepakkumar Rambhai Mevada v. PCIT (2022) 93 ITR 8 (SN)/)/ 215 TTJ 428/ 209 DTR 298 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Capital asset-Relinquishment of right in asset-Compensation-Right to sue-Compensation correctly assessed as capital gains-Revision to assess the compensation as income from other sources is held to be not valid. [S. 2(14), 45, 56]

Actia (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 93 ITR 65 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Transfer pricing adjustment-Failure by Assessing Officer to make assessment in conformity with order of Transfer Pricing Officer-Revision is valid. [S. 92CA]

Elite India Constructions P. Ltd. v. CIT (Appeals) (2022) 93 ITR 20 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.) Sameer Granites Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (CPC) (TDS) (2022) 93 ITR 33 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 234E : Fee-Default in furnishing the statements-Statements of tax deducted at source-Levy of fees for Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 not justified-CIT (A) erred in not condoning the delay. [S. 200A, 250]

Amit Mantri v. Dy. CIT (2022) 93 ITR 62 (SN) / 215 TTJ 533 / 209 DTR 182 (SMC) (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 198 : Deduction at source-Tax deducted is income received-Credit for tax deducted-Refund-Duty of Assessing Officer to allow credit-Rejection of claim to refund treating letters as barred by limitation-Held to be not proper-Directed the Assessing Officer to allow credit and grant consequential refund. [S. 154(7), 199, 26AS]

Brij Kishore Kochar v. ACIT (2022)93 ITR 64 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-No incriminating documents found-No assessment was pending-long term capital gains-Addition is not justified. [S. 45, 143(3)]

Dy. CIT v. Coal Sale Co. Ltd. (2022) 93 ITR 1 (SN) (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Accommodation entries-Information from Investigation wing-Name of assessee was not appearing in statement-Reopening is bad in law. [S. 148]

East Coast Consultants and Infrastructure Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 93 ITR 72 (SN) / 213 DTR 16 / 216 TTJ 623 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years–Depreciation-Granted on Bridge at rate applicable to building instead of rate applicable to plant and machinery-Reassessment valid-Direction of CIT(A) to allow amortization of expenditure incurred during tenure of agreement is justified. [S. 32(1)(ii), 37(1), 143(3), 148]

Dy. CIT v. Navratna Organizers and Developers P. Ltd. (2022) 93 ITR 14 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Developer-Mercantile system of accounting-Completion project-Deletion of additions on account of estimation of work-in-progress is justified.

Thai Glico Co. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2022) 93 ITR 38 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 139 : Return of income-Return of loss-Non-Resident company-Return of loss filed beyond due date-Not eligible to carry forward losses. [S. 139(1)]