Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


JSVM Plywood Industries Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 209 DTR 166 / 324 CTR 228 (Gau.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Validity of notice-section 148A would not apply till limitation prescribed under section 148 does not lapse or expire-Notice has stayed-Matter was adjourned to 24-1-2022. [S. 132, 148, 151, Art, 226]

Lalit Kumar Poddar v. ITO (2022) 213 DTR 343 / 326 CTR 659 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issuing of notice-Natural justice-Not considered the material available on record passed order, needs to be set aside for consideration. [S. 148, 148(d), Art. 226]

Late Shobha Mehta (Through Legal Heir Sh. Kanhaya Lal Mehta) v. ACIT (2022) 218 DTR 262/(2023) 335 CTR 1110 (Raj.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Notice issued in the name of a dead person-Reassessment was invalid .[S. 144, 147, Art. 226]

Mamta Gupta v. NFAC (2022) 217 DTR 54 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Penny stock-Information from investigation wing-Fresh material-No change of opinion-Reassessment notice is valid. [S. 148, 151, Art. 226]

Ramesh Chandra v. NFAC (2022) 216 DTR 293 / 327 CTR 744 (Raj.)(HC) Mahaveer Infra Engineering (P) Ltd v. NFAC (2022) 216 DTR 293 / 327 CTR 744 (Raj.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-A bonafide request made for personal hearing through video conferencing on the portal-window for submitting reply was closed before the stipulated time-A gross violation of principles of natural justice-Order was quashed and set aside. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Sri Ramjanki Tapovan Mandir v. CIT(E) (2022) 329 CTR 745 / 220 DTR 49 / (2023)451 ITR 458/ 290 Taxman 317 (Jharkhand)(HC)

S. 12AA : Procedure for registration-Trust or institution-Registration was granted after considering the genuineness Of institution-Cancellation of registration on the same provisions in the trust deed is not valid-Appeal To Appellate Tribunal-Powers Of Tribunal-Appellate Tribunal-Tribunal cannot make own case de novo. [S. 11(IA), 12AA(3), 254(1)]

Anil Ratanlal Bohra v .ACIT ( 2023) BCAJ- March – 31 ( Pune)( Trib)

S. 199 : Deduction at source – clubbing of income -Credit for tax deducted -Non -furnishing of the declaration by the deductee to the deductor – Credit for deduction of tax at source cannot be denied [ S. 64 , Rule 37BA(2) Form 26AS ]

Hotel Ashok Garden v . ITO ( 2023 ) BCAJ -March P. 30 ( Bang )( Trib)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake -Mistake apparent from the record -Credit for TCS -Rule applicable to TDS should also be applicable TCS- Denial of claim for TCS is not valid [ S. 199, Rule , 37BA(2)(i) ]

DCIT v. Vikram Developers and Promoters ( 2023) BCAJ -March P. 32 ( Pune )( Trib)

S. 115JC : Special provisions for payment of tax by certain persons other than a company- Provisions are applicable to projects approved before the introduction of the section . [ S.80OB(10) ]

Ananya Ajay Mittal v .DCIT( 2023) BCAJ -March -P. 22 ( Mum)( Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits – Non -Resident – Foreign bank accounts – Mentioning wrong status in the return – Once the assessee is non-resident the income or deposit in the foreign bank account cannot be taxed in India – Addition was deleted . [ S. 6(1), 56(2)(v) , 153A]