Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


ACIT v. Armee Infotech (2022) 193 ITD 728 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 80GGC : Contribution-Political parties-Failure of done to use it for object for which eligible-No disallowance can be made in the hands of donor.

Kimaya Impex (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 193 ITD 710 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Sales accepted-Disallowance restricted to 12.5 % of aggregate value of alleged bogus purchases.

ITO v. Parsoli Motor Works (P.) Ltd. (2022) 193 ITD 585 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share application money-Not furnished explanation about nature and source of credit-Addition is confirmed.

Kiran R. Sawlani v. ITO(IT) (2022) 193 ITD 852 / 215 TTJ 654/ 210 DTR 17 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Fair market value of property-Purchase of property-Stamp valuation-Addition was not valid-Matter remanded. [S. 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii)]

Dy. CIT v. Credtalpha Alternative Investment Advisors (P.) Ltd. (2022) 193 ITD 502 / 94 ITR 596 / 215 TTJ 801 / 210 DTR 100 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Share capital at premium-Discount cash flow method (DCF)-Net asset method (NAV)-AO could not adopt NAV method merely for reason that there was deviation in actual figures from projected figures shown in DCF method-Deletion of addition is affirmed. [S. 56(2)viib), R. 11U, 11UA]

Peninsula Land Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 193 ITD 366 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 55A : Capital gains-Reference to valuation officer-Prior to 1-7-2012, no reference to DVO could be made under section 55A where AO was of view that FMV of property as on 1-4-1981 was less than value declared by assessee. [S. 45]

Ashok Kukreja v. ITO (2022) 193 ITD 888 (Indore)(Trib.)

S. 54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Residential house-Purchase of residential property on first floor of a complex having shops constructed on ground floor-Entitle to exemption. [S. 45]

Bellandur Chikkagurappa Jayaramareddy v. ACIT (2022) 193 ITD 757 / (2023) 223 TTJ 827(Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Guidance value to be taken on the agreement for sale and not on the date of Registration-Proviso to section 50C(1) inserted by Finance Act, 2016 is retrospective. [S. 45]

Baskarababu Usha (Mrs.) v. ITO (2022) 193 ITD 573 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Reference to DVO-Where the reference is made DVO the Assessing Officer completed the assessment adopting deemed sale consideration before receipt of valuation report by DVO-Matter remanded-For purpose of computing exemption under section 54F, deeming fiction provided under section 50C could not be enlarged. [S. 45, 48, 54F]

Mahesh Pratapsingh Asher v. ACIT (2022) 193 ITD 336 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 48 : Capital gains-Computation-Amount paid for removing encumbrance to a property without which sale or transfer could not be effected, is allowable as deduction. [S. 48(1)]