Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Michelin India Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 442 ITR 268 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 254(2A) : Appellate Tribunal-Stay-Delay in proceedings not attributable to assessee-Tribunal has the power to grant stay even beyond period of 365 days. [S. 254(1)]

CIT v. RNS Infrastructure Ltd. (2022) 442 ITR 417 / 286 Taxman 509 (Karn.)(HC)/Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed , CIT (Central) v. RNS Infrastructure Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 101 (SC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Limitation-Delay in passing order not due to assessee-Delay could be condoned. [S. 245D(4), 245HA(1)(iv)]

Pitchai Rajagopal Shiva Kumaar v. UOI (2022) 442 ITR 33 / 212 DTR 401 / 326 CTR 219 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 245A : Settlement Commission-Cessation of Settlement Commission-Pendency of proceedings as on 31-1-2021-Constitutional validity of provision-Directions are issued to consider the applications by the Interim Board would be if the proceedings were pending as on January 31, 2021. [S. 245C, Art. 14, 19(1)(g), 20(2), 21, 226]

Swamina International Pvt. Ltd. v. ITSC (2022) 442 ITR 343 / 286 Taxman 26/ 214 DTR 175 / 327 CTR 684(Cal.)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Violation of principle of natural justice-No opportunity is given to raise objections to order-Order of Settlement Commission is set a-side. [S. 245C, 245D(3), 245D(4), Art. 226]

Ramesth Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 442 ITR 181 / 209 DTR 462 / 324 CTR 337 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 245 : Refund-Set off of refunds against tax remaining payable–Opportunity of hearing not provided before adjustment-Entitled to refund of adjustments in excess of 20 Per Cent. [S. 156, 220, 227, Art. 226]

Rohan Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO(IT). (2022) 442 ITR 404 / 211 DTR 164 / 325 CTR 395 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 244A : Refund-Interest on refunds-Deduction of tax at source-Excess deduction-Interest payable to deductor-Interest to be calculated from payment of tax. [S. 195(2)]

R. Pannerselvam v. PCIT (2022) 442 ITR 376 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 237 : Refunds-Reassessment-Failure to file returns within time-Notice of reassessment must be issued-Procedure laid down in Income-Tax Act must be followed by Income-Tax Authorities-Directed to examine the claim of refund within a period of three months. [S. 119, 147, 148, Art. 226]

Aditi Infrabuild and Services Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 442 ITR 50 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Adjustment of refund in excess of 20 Per Cent of tax in dispute-Held to be not valid-Directed to refund adjustment made in excess of 20 per cent-Stay granted till disposal of appeal by CIT(A). [S. 156, 220(6), 245, Art. 226]

State Bank of India v. ACIT (TDS) (2022) 442 ITR 363 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 192 : Deduction at source-Salary-Failure to deduct ta at source-Plea of bona fide belief based on circular issued by employer for its own use-No clarification by Income-Tax Authorities-Levy of interest is valid. [S. 10(5), 133A, 201(1), 201(1A), R. 2B]

Oracle Financial Services Software Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 286 Taxman 469 //(2023)452 ITR 272 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-All relevant material in respect of employee costs reimbursed to overseas subsidiaries furnished in the course of original assessment proceedings-Change of opinion-Reassessment notice is not valid. [S. 92CA, 148, Art. 226]