Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kamlesh Gupta v. UOI (2021) 283 Taxman 237 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 132B : Application of seized or requisitioned assets-Jewellery seized-Failure to pass an order within period of 120 days on which last authorisation of search was executed-Entire jewellery seized was directed to be released. [S. 132, Art. 226]

Nayaar Patel v. ACIT (2021) 323 CTR 1005 / (2022)441 ITR 148 / 209 DTR 226(Ker.)(HC)

S. 132(4) : Search and seizure-Statement on oath-Undisclosed income-Retraction-Failure to produce any evidence contrary to the statement-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 132]

PCIT v. Mckinsey Knowledge Centre India (P) Ltd. (2021) 323 CTR 360 / 207 DTR 60/( 2022) 284 Taxman 484 (Delhi)(HC)Editorial : Notice issued in SLP filed by Revenue , PCIT v. Mckinsey Knowledge Centre India (P) Ltd. (2022) 288 Taxman 640 (SC).

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Functionally different-Justified in directing for exclusion of ABCL from the list of comparables-Interest receivable-Notional interest for relating to alleged delayed in collecting receivable-No substantial question of law-Question as to whether in a given case transfer pricing adjustment on delayed receivable could apply even to a debt-free company or not. does not arise on facts and is left open. [S. 260A]

PCIT v. Li & Fung (India) P. Ltd. (2021) 130 taxmann.com 438 (Delhi) (HC) Editorial : SLP is granted to the revenue ; PCIT v. Li & Fung (India) P. Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 4 (SC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-TNM method-Transaction of buying services for sourcing garments in India-Addition made to ALP by applying cost plus 5 per cent mark-up on FOB value of exports among third parties was not supported under rule 10B(1)(e) and was liable to be deleted. [R. 10B(1)(e)]

Sudarsanan P. S. v. CIT (2021) 283 Taxman 84 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Failure to explain the source-Justified in confirming the disallowance.

CIT v. Midas Golden Distilleries (P) Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 395//(2022)441 ITR 293 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share application money-Shell companies-Share holders could not explain their source-Addition is held to be justified.

Caborandum Universal Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 283 Taxman 312 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 48 : Capital gains-Computation-Full value of consideration-Retention of money in Escrow account-Possession was handed over-Amount of money in Escrow account has to be considered while computing the capital gain for the purpose of full consideration. [S. 45]

Oil Palm India Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 208 DTR 345/(2022) 324 CTR 171 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Tax paid under Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act-Not allowable as deduction. [S. 10(1), 37(1), Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1991]

Sudarsanan P.S. v. CIT (2021) 283 Taxman 84 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Payment of freight and carriage charges for previous year 2006-07 (1-4-2006 to 31-3-2007)-Disallowance is held to be not valid-Commission payment disallowance is held to be justified. [S. 194C]

PCIT v. Gopakumaran Nair (2021) 283 Taxman 173 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Commission charges to overseas agents-Service rendered outside India-Cannot be considered as fees for technical services-Not liable to deduct tax at source-Art, 12-OECD Model convention. [S. 9(1)(vii), 195]