Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Naina Sarf v. PCIT (2021) BCAJ-November-P. 34 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Allotment letter prior to AY. 2014-15-Registration was on 9th December, 2014-Provision of section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) is not applicable-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii)]

Alfa Laval Lund AB v. CIT (2021) BCAJ-December-P. 47 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Revision order passed on the basis of recommendation of Assessing Officer has no statutory sanction-Order is bad in law. [S. 143(3)]

Manorama Devi Jaiswal v. ITO (2021) BCAJ-December-P. 46 (Kol.) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Reference to dispute resolution panel-Order passed without complying the mandatory procedure prescribed u/s.144C is non-est-Order which is a nullity and non-est cannot be a revised. [S. 144C, Art. 14, 21]

Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT (2021) The Chamber’s Journal-November-P. 100 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Investment in new pant or machinery-Possible view-When an amendment is made to clarify or remove the hardship, the same is to be treated as clarificatory and it should be applied with retrospective effect-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 32AC, 143(3)]

Rakesh Kumar Pandita v. ACIT (2021) BCAJ-December-P. 46 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Expenditure-Allowance-Loss of current year can be set off against income declared u/s 115BBD-Tax on certain dividends received from foreign companies-Debatable cannot be rectified. [S. 115BBD, 143(1)]

Rishabh Metals & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) The Chamber’s Journal-November-P. 101 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Recorded reasons not provided-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 148]

Tapan Chakraborty v. ITO (2021) BCAJ-October-P. 53 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-AIR Information-Cash credits-Cash deposit in the bank-Assessing Officer failed to make reasonable enquiry-Reassessment was quashed. [S. 44AE, 68, 148]

Nutan Warehousing Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) BCAJ-July-P. 46 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Accrual of income-Real income theory-Interest income-Realisation becomes impossible-Income cannot be assessed on hypothetical basis. [S. 4, 5]

DCIT v. Late Ajit Kumar Vaddevalli L/R-Vadevalli Sarita Devi (2021) The Chamber’s Journal-August-P 83 (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Order passed in the name of a deceased person is invalid and sustainable in the eyes of law. [ITAT R. 27]

Batliboi Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 62 CCH 160 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 115JB : Book profit-Capital receipt-A particular receipt cannot be assessed as book profit merely on the ground that the assessee has offered it in the return of income. [S. 2(24),4]