Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sir Ratan Tata Trust v. DCIT (2021) 188 ITD 151 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Investment in shares has been accepted as part of corpus over four decades-Interest income qualified for exemption-Assessing Officer has adopted ab course permissible in law-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 11(5), 13(1)(d), 13(2)(h), 13(3)]

Jalgaon People’s Co-op Bank Ltd. v. PCIT (2021) 188 ITD 608 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Bad debts-Claim was allowed without verification-Revision is held to be justified. [S. 36(1)(vii)]

Rameshbhai V. Prajapati v. DCIT (2021) 188 ITD 773 (Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Delay in filing miscellaneous application-Ex parte order-ill health-Delay was condoned. [ITAT R. 24]

Carraro India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 188 ITD 915 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Most appropriate method-Application to Tribunal to direct the TPO to adopt a specific method was rejected. [S. 254(1), 92C]

DCIT v. GMR Energy Ltd. (2021) 188 ITD 480 / 213 TTJ 109 / 204 DTR 256 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Jurisdiction-Direction of DGIT not to pass the during pendency of explanation-Order passed without following the direction and jurisdiction was set aside. [S. 120, 246A]

Jyoti Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 188 ITD 890 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 206AA : Requirement to furnish Permanent Account Number-Double taxation agreement-Provision of 206AA does not override the provision of double taxation agreement-Tax deducted as per the provision of DTAA is held to be valid-DTAA-India-Czech Republic. [S. 90, Art. 12]

DCIT v. Edelweiss Financial Advisors Ltd. (2021) 188 ITD 834 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 194J : Deduction at source-Fees for professional or technical services-Transaction fee paid to stock exchange-Not liable to deduct tax at source.

Prestige Estates Projects Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 188 ITD 711 / 212 TTJ 23/ 86 ITR 629 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 194IA : Deduction at source-Immoveable property-Joint development agreement-Interest free deposit-No transfer of property-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 2(47)(v), 201, 201A, 203A, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S. 53A]

DCIT v. Edelweiss Financial Advisors Ltd. (2021) 188 ITD 834 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 194I : Deduction at source-Rent-VSAT and lease line charges to stock exchange-Not liable to deduct tax at source.

Uber India Systems (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT (TDS) (2021) 188 ITD 362 / 211 TTJ 1 / 202 DTR 129 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 194C : Deduction at source-Contractors-Services on a principal-to principal bases-Payment to drivers-Cannot be treated as assessee in default for failure to deduct tax at source. [S. 201(1), 201(A), 204]