Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Sesa Goa Ltd. (2021)439 ITR 188 /132 taxmann.com 42 ( Panji Bench ) (Bom) (HC))

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment – Alleged wrong claim of deduction – Claim was allowed – Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [ S.. 10B ]

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment – Alleged wrong claim of deduction – Claim was allowed – Deletion of penalty is held to be justified. [ S.. 10B ]

Jugal Kishore Jajodia v. S. C. Prasad, Chief Engineer (2021)439 ITR 132 /( 2022) 286 Taxman 66 (Bom) (HC)

S. 269UD : Purchase by Central Government of immoveable properties –Transfer of property by charitable Trust – Sanction of Charity Commissioner should be taken in to account – Adequate opportunity was not given – Notice and pre -Emptive purchase was held to be not valid . [ S. 269UC, 269UL, Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, S. 36, Art , 226 ]

CIT v. Emsons Exim Pvt. Ltd. (2021)439 ITR 607/ (2022) 209 DTR 466/ 326 CTR 96 (Bom) (HC)

S. 268A : Appeal – Instructions- Issue involved having cascading effect – Fee-Default in furnishing the statements- Does not fall with any criteria prescribed in clause 10 of Circular No 3 of 2018 dated July , 11, 2018 ( 2018 ) 405 ITR 29 (St) , as amended by circular dated August 20 , 2018 ( 2018) 407 ITR 7(St) – Alternative remedy – Writ against the order of Tribunal deleting the addition is held to be not maintainable – [ S. 234E, 254(1) , 260A, 268A(4) Art , 226 ]

CIT, LTU v. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 549 (Bom.) (HC) CIT, LTU v. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. (2021) 283 Taxman 549 (Bom.) (HC).Editorial: SLP of Revenue dismissed , CIT v. LTU v. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. (2022) 287 Taxman 218/ 114 CCH 49 (SC)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Book profit – Decommissioning levy, interest on decommissioning fund, interest on R & M fund and interest on R & D fund to profit as per profit and loss account – Revision was held to be not justified when in order passed by Commissioner, there was no mention as to under which category of Explanations (a) to (k) of section 115JB(2) these four items would fall- Order of Tribunal quashing the revision order was affirmed [ S. 115JB , 143(3) ]

CIT (TDS ) v. Super Religare Laboratories Ltd (2021 ) 133 taxmann.com 313/ 323 CTR 757/ 208 DTR 21 /(2022) 284 Taxman 657 ( Bom) (HC).Editorial : Notice issued in SLP filed by the Revenue , CIT v. Super Religare Laboratories Ltd. (2022) 287 Taxman 561 / 288 Taxman 639 (SC)

S. 194H : Deduction at source – Commission or brokerage –No principle agency relation ship -Laboratory and testing services – laboratory and testing services to customers through its own and through third party collection centres- Not liable to deduct tax at source . [ S. 201 (1), 201(1A) ]

CIT v. SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd. (2021)439 ITR 566/ ( 2022) 285 Taxman 322 (Bom)(HC)

S. 194D : Deduction at source – Insurance commission – Insurance Agent – Survey – Foreign travel expenses – Expenses were paid directly to service provided – No amount was paid to the agents – Not liable to deduct tax at source – Order of Tribunal is affirmed [ S. 133A, 194J, 201(1), 201(IA) ]

Sainath Rajkumar Sarode v. State of Maharashtra (2021) 283 Taxman 494 (Bom.) (HC)

S. 194A : Deduction at source – Interest other than interest on securities – Builder –Judgement debt – Compensatory interest failure to hand over possession of flat – TDS was not liable to be deducted. [ S. 2(28A) , Real Estate ( Regulation & Development ) Act 2016 (RERA ) Art , 226 ]

Alok Knit Exports Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2021) 283 Taxman 221 /(2022) 446 ITR 748/ 213 DTR 74(Bom.) (HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment –Merger – Notice issued in the name of entity which had ceased to exist – Fundamental error – Which cannot be corrected under section 292B of the Act [ S. 147 , 292B , Art , 226 ]

John Sebastian Zezito Lobo v. ACIT (2021)439 ITR 537 / 283 Taxman 229 ( Panji Bench ) (Bom) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years- Jurisdictional issue – Capital gains –Large deduction of expenses – Exemption claimed – Prima facie showing escapement of income – Notice of reassessment is held to be valid – Writ is held to be not maintainable [ S. 45, 54F , 143(1), 148 , Art , 226 ]

PCIT v . EPC Industries Ltd. (2021)439 ITR 210 (Bom) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years- Waiver of loan – Change of opinion- Query raised during regular assessment proceedings – Order of Tribunal affirmed – No question of law [ S. 28(iv), 41 (1)) 148]