Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


National Institute of Women Child & Rural Health Trust v. JCIT (2021) 208 DTR 433 / (2022) 215 TTJ 400/ 194 ITD 214 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 272A : Penalty-Failure to answer questions-Sign statements-Furnish information-Delay in filing return-Hospitalization of managing trustee-Reasonable cause-Assessing Officer is directed to delete the penalty. [S. 12AA, 139, 272(2)(e), 273B]

ACIT v. Dharmanandan Diamonds (P.) Ltd. (2021) 91 ITR 40 (SN) (2022) 193 ITD 133 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 271G : Penalty-Documents-International transaction-Transfer pricing-Diamond business-Maintaining primary books of account and documents-Transactions accepted to be at Arm’s Length-Failure by Transfer Pricing Officer to determine Arm’s Length Price independently by applying one of prescribed methods-Deletion of penalty is justified.

My Guest House Accommodations Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 91 ITR 45 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Ad hoc disallowance-Penalty is not sustainable.

My Guest House Accommodations Pvt. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2021) 91 ITR 45 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Ad hoc disallowance-Penalty is not sustainable.

Jamsetji Tata Trust v. ACIT (2021) 198 DTR 46 (Mum.)(Trib.) Interocean Shipping (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 91 ITR 63 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.) S. D. Constructions v ACIT (2021) 91 ITR 43 (SN) (Kol.)(Trib.) Transgulf Frozen Foods Containers Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 91 ITR (Trib.) 22 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Denial of exemption u/s 11-High Court admitted the appeal-Not specifying the specific limb of section 271(1)(c)-Penalty not leviable. [S. 11. 13, 260A]

Majestic Stock Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2021) 91 ITR 71 (SN) (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Show cause notice and discussion restricted too share application money-Reassessment order not erroneous and prejudicial to revenue-Revision order was quashed. [S. 68, 147, 148]

Chandravadan Desai v. PCIT (2021) 91 ITR 78 (SN) (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Reassessment-Revision notice a verbatim copy of reasons recorded by Assessing Officer for reopening assessment-Assessing Officer Accepting returned income after verifying explanation-Revision by PCIT not sustainable. [S. 143(3), 147]

Ashish Dham v. PCIT (2021) 91 ITR 75 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Proceedings for rectification was dropped-Revision based on audit objection-Revision is not sustainable. [S. 24B, 154]

P. S. Srijan Height Developers v. PCIT (2021) 91 ITR 246 (Kol.) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Interest expenditure allowed after conducting enquiry-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 143(3)]

India Cements Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 91 ITR 541 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Set off of brought forward business loss-No excess unabsorbed depreciation allowed while computing book Profit-Issue of show-cause notice beyond period of two years from date of original assessment Order-Revision barred by limitation-Revision quashed. [S. 115JB]