Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Rochana Agarwal v. ACIT (2022) 446 ITR 529 / 287 Taxman 260/ 218 DTR 501/ 329 CTR 270 (All.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-Transactions disclosed found subsequently to be bogus-Notice valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Renault Nissan Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. NEAC (2022) 446 ITR 555 / 220 DTR 405/(2023) 335 CTR 462(Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Notice-Order of reassessment without considering objections-Not valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Distributors India (South) v. UOI.(No. 2) (2022)446 ITR 177 (2023) 332 CTR 574 (All.)(HC) Editorial : Distributors India (South) v. UOI (NO. 1) (2022) 446 ITR 163 / 288 Taxman 346 / (2023) 332 CTR 585(All)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Failure To Disclose material facts-Not disclosing receipts under Section 194J and reimbursement of expenses-Proper recording of satisfaction-Decision could not be reviewed-Notice could not be declared invalid.[S. 148 ,260A, Code of Civil Procedure, Order 47, Rule 1, Art. 226]

Distributors India (South) v. UOI (NO. 1) (2022) 446 ITR 163 / 288 Taxman 346 /(2023) 332 CTR 585(All.)(HC) Editorial : Review petition dismissed, Distributors India (South) v. UOI.(No. 2) (2022) 446 ITR 177 /(2023) 332 CTR 574(All.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Failure To Disclose material facts-Not disclosing receipts under Section 194J and reimbursement of expenses-Proper recording of satisfaction-Notice valid. [S. 148, 151, 194C, 194J, Form 26AS]

Ambuj Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. PRCIT (2022) 446 ITR 294 / 287 Taxman 490/ 219 DTR 65 / 329 CTR 205 (All.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-False disclosure is not true disclosure-Shell companies-Share premium-Share capital-Radha Fincom Pvt Ltd-Information from investigation wing-Bogus share capital-Notice valid-Writ petition was dismissed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. NFAC (2022) 446 ITR 734 / 287 Taxman 40// 220 DTR 105/ 329 DTR 502 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Principles of natural justice-Precedent-Decision of Supreme Court binding on all Courts and all authorities-Appellate Tribunal-Decision of Tribunal is binding on all authorities. [S. 254(1), Art. 226]

Omkar Nath v. NFAC (2022) 446 ITR 337 / 287 Taman 108 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Variation in income prejudicial to assessee-Failure to provide requested opportunity of personal hearing-Assessment order and consequent notices set aside. [S. 143(3), 144B(7)(vii), 156, 270A, Art. 226]

Popular Vehicles and Services Ltd. v. NEAS (2022) 446 ITR 374 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Draft assessment-Modification in return-Principle of natural justice-Order set aside. [Art. 226]

K. A. Rauf v. ACIT (No. 2) (2022) 446 ITR 436 (Ker.)(HC) Editorial : Order of single judge, K.A. Rauf v. ACIT (No. 1) (2022) 446 ITR 432 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment order-Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Order passed without giving an opportunity of cross examination-Writ petition was filed after one year of passing of the Order-Writ is not maintainable-Order of single judge is affirmed. [S. 131, 246A, Art. 226]

Dastan Residency v. NEAC (2022) 446 ITR 571 / 210 DTR 271 /325 CTR 468/ 138 taxmann.com 375 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Violation of natural justice-High-pitched assessment-Denial of opportunity for personal hearing-Assessment not valid. [S. 143(3A), 143(3B), Art. 226]