Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Tapasi Singh (Smt.) v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 7 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Gifts-Identity and creditworthiness was established-Addition was held to be not justified.

Karamjit S. Jaiswal v. DCIT (2021) 190 ITD 394 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Foreign bank account of deceased father-Information from investigation wing-Failure to provide certified copy of bank account and bank statement-Addition was deleted-Remanded with specific direction to provide certified copy of bank statement and nexus with bank deposits. [S. 5(1)), 147, 148]

Renu Proptech (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 190 ITD 378 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital at premium-Valuation report-Real estate-Identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions was proved-Addition was held to be unjustified.

Sweet Sales (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 461 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital-Share premium-Share subscriber did not appear for personal attendance-Matter remanded.

DCIT v. Mahalaxmi TMT (P.) Ltd. (2021) 190 ITD 582 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital and share premium-Copy of bank statements, confirmation of parties copy of ITR along with balance sheet was furnished-Deletion of addition was held to be justified.

Mega international (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 190 ITD 559 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Sundry creditor-Confirmation filed before the CIT(A) was rejected-The addition was deleted.

Ashutosh Jha. v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 450 (SMC) (Kol.) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Purchase of property-Part payment was made by cheque next day-Agreement and registration was done after one year-Addition was held to be not justified when the provision was not in exist when the agreement was entered in to. [S. 56(2)(vii)(b)]

Him Agri Fesh (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 429 / 90 ITR 95 (Amritsar)(Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Method of valuation of shares-Discount Cash Flow method (DCF)-Method of valuation of shares adopted by assessee could be challenged by Assessing Officer only if it was not a recognized method of valuation as per rule 11UA(2)-Matter remanded. [S. 56(2)(viib), R. 11UA(2)]

High Wings Construction (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 673 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Share capital and share premium-Additional evidence-Matter remanded. [S.56(2)(viib), Rule 11UA]

Avtar Krishen Jalla v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 443 / (2022) 216 TTJ 177 / 210 DTR 289 (SMC) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Amount not utilised before specified date-Amount liable too tax. [S. 45, 147]