Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Chandravadan Desai v. PCIT (2021) 91 ITR 78 (SN) (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Reassessment-Revision notice a verbatim copy of reasons recorded by Assessing Officer for reopening assessment-Assessing Officer Accepting returned income after verifying explanation-Revision by PCIT not sustainable. [S. 143(3), 147]

Ashish Dham v. PCIT (2021) 91 ITR 75 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Proceedings for rectification was dropped-Revision based on audit objection-Revision is not sustainable. [S. 24B, 154]

P. S. Srijan Height Developers v. PCIT (2021) 91 ITR 246 (Kol.) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Interest expenditure allowed after conducting enquiry-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 143(3)]

India Cements Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 91 ITR 541 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Set off of brought forward business loss-No excess unabsorbed depreciation allowed while computing book Profit-Issue of show-cause notice beyond period of two years from date of original assessment Order-Revision barred by limitation-Revision quashed. [S. 115JB]

Gopal Chandra Manna v. PCIT (2021) 91 ITR 193 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Mistake committed by consultant in declaring wrong turnover in service tax returns-Assessing Officer making addition of profit element embedded in undisclosed receipts at 8 Per Cent.-Order of revision not valid. [S. 143(3)]

Bhavya RPG Trust v. PCIT (2021) 91 ITR 135 (Delhi)(Trib.) Varnika RPG Trust v. PCIT (2021) 91 ITR 135 (Delhi)(Trib.) Dhruv Gupta (Manish Dhruv Trust) v. PCIT (2021) 91 ITR 135 (Delhi.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Trust deed providing for its dissolution on beneficiary attaining age 18-Revenue was informed about dissolution of Trust-Notice issued in name of trust after extinguishment of trust-Not curable defects-Notice illegal and Order to be quashed. [S. 143(3), 292B]

Dy. CIT v. Mumbai Nasik Expressway Ltd. (2021) 91 ITR 486 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Revision order was quashed-Assessment order passed consequent of revision order is quashed. [S. 32(1)(ii), 143(3)]

Dada Ganpati Gaur Products (P) Ltd. v. PCIT (2021) 207 DTR 105 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-DCF Method-Valuation of shares Assessment order was passed considering the point wise reply to the notice u/s 142(1) and 143(2) of the Act-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 56(2)(viib) R. 11UA(2)(b)]

Seyad Shariat Finance Ltd. v. PCIT (2021) 206 DTR 282 / 91 ITR 4 (SN) / 213 TTJ 897 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Limitation-Issue was not subject matter of assessment u/s 153C–Original order on 28-3-2016-Revision order passed on 9-12-2020-Barred by limitation. [S.80IA, 143(3), 153C]

Noor Resorts Pvt. Ltd. v. PCCIT (2021) 209 TTJ 380 /198 DTR 161 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Purchase and sale of properties-Stock in trade-Rental income is assessed as business income-Disallowance of depreciation and vehicle expenses-Revision order was quashed. [S. 28(i), 32, 37(1), 56, 143(3)]