Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Dy. CIT v. AGC Net Work Ltd. (2020) 192 DTR 273 / 204 TTJ 850 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Books of Accounts-Change in accounting policy-Provision for such liabilities that cannot be determined with certainty is to be determined based on best estimate.

Basware Corporation India v. DCIT (2020) 194 DTR 75 / 207 TTJ 115 (Chd.)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Assessment order passed-Disregard to directions by DRP-Not within the sanctity of law-Order was quashed. [S. 143(3), 153, 153B]

Eva Developers (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 203 TTJ 355 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Cash credits-Sufficient cause for failure to appear before the AO-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S. 68, 133(6)]

Dy. CIT v. Ashok Vihar (2020) 205 TTJ 547 (Raipur)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Search and seizure-loose sheet Pen drive-Not corroborated by other evidence-Deletion of addition is held to be justified. [S. 132]

Grand Lilly Motels Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 203 TTJ 30 (UO) (Amritsar) (Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Estimate of sales-Only profit element can be considered as income-Matter remanded.

Global One India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 194 DTR 361 / 208 TTJ 129 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Audit of accounts-Audited financial statements along with audit report was not filed-In the interest of substantial justice AO to make assessment after considering audited financial statement and audit report. [S. 44AB]

Bhaval Synthetics (India) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 196 DTR 265 / 208 TTJ 937 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Income returned in pursuance of notice issued u/s. 148 was accepted-Requirement of issue of notice u/s. 143(2) is not required-Assessment is valid. [S. 147, 148]

ACIT v. Padma Logistics & Khanji (P) Ltd (2020) 208 TTJ 67 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 139 : Return of income-Intimation under section 143(1)-Does not lapse right to file a revised return of income-Appeal is allowed. [S. 139(5), 143(1)]

Jewels Emporium v. ACIT (2020) 208 TTJ 430 (Jaiour)(Trib.)

S. 132(4) : Search and seizure-Statement on oath-Excess stock and cash-Not supported by documentary evidences-Cannot be sustained-Appeal allowed. [S. 131, 143(3)]

Venkata Satya Surya Sree Ranganadha Raju Alluri v. ITO (2020) 203 TTJ 25 (SMC) (UO) (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 132(4) : Search and seizure-Statement on oath-Opportunity to cross examine witness not given-Addition was deleted-Presumption as to assets, books of account-In whose possession in found-it is presumed it belongs to the person. [S. 292C]