Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 440 ITR 594 (Karn.)(HC)

S.14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No exempt income-No disallowance can be made. [R.8D]

Ilahia Trust v. CIT (2022) 440 ITR 90 / 209 DTR 355 / 325 CTR 337 / 285 Taxman 312 (Ker.)(HC).Editorial : SLP dismissed as withdrawn , Ilahia Trust v. CIT [2023] 291 Taxman 200 (SC)

S. 13 : Denial of exemption-Trust or institution-Investment restrictions-Advance to proprietary concern of wife of managing Trustee-Explanation was not satisfactory-Disallowance was held to be proper. [S. 12AA, 13(1)(c)]

PCIT v. Shreedhar Associates (2022) 440 ITR 547 (Guj) ( HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment –On money – Survey – Income voluntarily offered- Deletion of penalty is held to be justified [ S. 131(IA), 133A]

PCIT v. Shalimar Pellet Feeds Ltd. (2022) 440 ITR 530 / 216 DTR 211/ 328 CTR 840(Cal) (HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Matter to be remanded to Commissioner where evidence was not considered by him- Monetary limits – Appeal was dismissed .[ S. 80IB, 153A, 254(1), 260A]

South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. v. PCIT (2022) 440 ITR 568 (Chhattisgarh) (HC)

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record – Delay of 1924 days ( Eight years) -Condonation of delay was dismissed . [. 260A ]

Sree Karumariamman Granites v. ACIT (2022) 440 ITR 537/ 209 DTR 283/ 324 CTR 418 (Mad) (HC)

S. 246A : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Writ against assessment order – Alternative remedy – Writ petition was dismissed .[S. 143(3), 248, Art, 226 ]

Olari Little Flower Kuries (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2022) 440 ITR 26/210 DTR 145/ 324 CTR 616 (Ker) (HC)

S.234E: Fee – Default in furnishing the statements – Provision for levy of late fee for delay in filing — Valid — Intimation calling for payment of late fee for delaying filing of return — Not sustainable for periods prior to June 1, 2015 [S. 200A, Art , 226 ]

Premlata Soni ( Smt.) v . NEAC (2022) 440 ITR 578 (MP) (HC)

S. 151 : Reassessment – After the expiry of four years – Sanction for issue of notice – Recording of separate reasons not necessary – Reassessment notice is held to be valid . [ S. 147, 148 , Art , 226 ]

JRS Pharma and Gujarat Microwax Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2022) 440 ITR 557 (Guj) ( HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years- Where the necessary details were disclosed, reopening is not valid. [ S. 148, Art , 226 ]

Bankim Bhagwanji Chaauhan v. ITO (2022) 440 ITR 485 (Guj) ( HC) Bankim Bhagwanji Chaauhan v. ITO (2022) 440 ITR 485 (Guj) ( HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years- Where the necessary details were disclosed, reopening is not valid. [ S. 54, 148, Art , 226 ]