Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Kite Maker v. ITO (2021) 438 ITR 353/(2022) 214 DTR 316/ 328 CTR 124 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Quantum of penalty-Penalty to be on basis of tax sought to be avoided and not on total tax liability.

Dy.CIT v. Vijay Pal Singh (2021) 130 Taxmann.com 291 (Chhattishgarh) (HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed, Dy. CIT v. Vijay Pal Singh (2021) 282 Taxman 377 (SC)

S. 268A : Appeal-Instructions-Lower than threshold limit-Exceptions-Special order-Penny stock cases-Organized tax evasion activity-Special order of Board is required in cases involving organized Tax evasion Activity.-Appeal was dismissed. [S. 260A.]

S. Ravinder v. CIT (2021) 282 Taxman 205 / 203 DTR 322 / 321 CTR 346 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Subject matter of appeal-Revised return-CIT (A) dismissed the appeal on the ground that the admitted tax was not paid–Rejection of revision application was held to be not justified-Matter remanded. [S. 246, Art. 226]

Riso India Private Limited v. PCIT (2021) 437 ITR 174 / 205 DTR 78/ 322 CTR 840 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Dismissal petition as premature without giving any reasons-Matter remanded and directed to pass a reasoned order. [Art. 226]

Tapas Kumar Basak v. ADIT(IT) (2021) 438 ITR 197 / 322 CTR 971/ ( 2022) 284 Taxman 224 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Return filed and assessed as resident-Scope is narrower than appeal-Revision application made to be assessed as Non-resident-Writ is not maintainable-Circular and Act-In case of conflict of provisions of Act will prevail. [S. 2(42), 6(1)(a), 144, 147, 154, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Shreeji Prints (P) Ltd. (2021) 130 taxmann.com 293 (Guj.)(HC) Editorial : SLP of revenue dismissed; PCIT v. Shreeji Prints (P.) Ltd. (2021) 282 Taxman 464 (SC))/( 2021) 437 ITR 10(ST)(SC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Unexplained investment-Un secured loans-Enquires were made in detail-Plausible view-Explanation 2-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 68, 69]

PCIT v. Cisco Systems Capital (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 437 ITR 349/ 206 DTR 143/ 323 CTR 563 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Depreciation-Two possible view-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 32]

PCIT v. Brahma Centre Development Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 437 ITR 285 / 205 DTR 249/ 323 CTR 888(Delhi) (HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Two possible view-Interest on fixed deposit-Order of revision is not valid. [S.143(3)]

PCIT v. Deccan Jewellera P. Ltd (2021) 438 ITR 131 / 206 DTR 257/ 322 CTR 952/ 283 Taxman 578 (AP)(HC) PCIT v. Deccan Tobacco Company (2021) 438 ITR 131 (AP)(HC) PCIT v. Dte Exports P. Ltd. (2021) 438 ITR 131 (AP)(HC)Editorial : Notice issued in SLP filed against High Court order CIT v. Deccan Tobacco Company ( 2022) 286 Taxman 558 (SC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Search and seizure-Undisclosed investment-Excess stock assessed as business income-Possible view-Revision order held to be not justified. [S. 69, 115BBE, 132, 153D, 260A]

PCIT v. Deccan Jewellera P. Ltd (2021) 438 ITR 131 / 206 DTR 257/ 322 CTR 952/ 283 Taxman 578 (AP)(HC) PCIT v. Deccan Tobacco Company (2021) 438 ITR 131 (AP)(HC) PCIT v. Dte Exports P. Ltd. (2021) 438 ITR 131 (AP)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Search and seizure-Undisclosed investment-Excess stock assessed as business income-Possible view-Revision order held to be not justified. [S. 69, 115BBE, 132, 153D, 260A]