Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Cognizant Technology Solutions India P. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (NO. 3) (2021) 437 ITR 438/ 323 CTR 252 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Change of opinion-Information from audit party-Sufficiency of reasons not to be gone into by High Court-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 10A, 10AA, 115JB, 148, Art. 226]

Cognizant Technology Solutions India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (NO. 2) (2021) 437 ITR 425/ 206 DTR 408/ 323 CTR 259(Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Within four years-Speaking order only with reference to reasons for reopening of assessment and not on all issues-Reassessment was held to be valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Cognizant Technology Solutions India P. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (No.1) (2021) 437 ITR 410/ 208 DTR 168/ 323 CTR 939 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Fringe benefits tax-Reason to believe-Information from audit-Disputed facts not to be adjudicated by Court-Reassessment proceeding is held to be valid. [S. 115WG, 115WH, 148, 150, Art. 226]

Amber v. Dy. CIT (2021) 437 ITR 45 / 282 Taxman 178 / 203 DTR 412 / 321 CTR 489 (Orissa) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Search and seizure-Information from DIT (Inv)-Bogus accommodation entries-Reassessment notice is held to be valid. [S. 68, 132(4), 148, Art. 226]

Sanjay Baulal Surana v. ACIT (2021) 438 ITR 269 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Accommodation entries-Information from Investigation wing-New material-Notice and rejection of objection was held to be valid. [S. 132, 148, Art. 226]

Navkar Electronics v. ITO (NO. 2) (2021) 438 ITR 676 / 208 DTR 315 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Observation of single judge as regards proceedings under section 147/ 148 of the Act in relation to search related issues was seta side, Navkar Electronics v. ITO (NO. 1) (2021)438 ITR 671/ 208 DTR 320 (Mad) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Search and seizure-Assessment of third person-Jurisdiction-Decision of single judge was set aside-Assessee was given liberty to raise additional grounds on the issue of jurisdiction. [S. 132, 147, 153C, Art. 226]

Hareshbhai Mathurbhai Zinzuwadia v. ACIT (2021) 438 ITR 413 /2022) 284 Taxman 220 / 215 DTR 323/ 328 CTR 931 (Guj.)(HC)/ Darshit Asokbhai Zinzuvadia v ACIT ( 2022) 215 DTR 323/ 328 CTR 931 ( Guj)( HC

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Gift by proprietor of Jewellery business to his close relatives-Relatives investing gifts in business and forming a partnership-Notice was held to be valid. [S.143 (1), 148, Art. 226]

Bayer Vapi Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 438 ITR 495/(2022) 284 Taxman 267 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Failure to deduct tax at source-Alternative remedy-Writ petition was dismissed. [S. 40(a)(ia), 43B, 148, Art. 226]

Kavitaben Jaysukhbhai Zalawadiya v. ITO (2021) 282 Taxman 265 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Land used for agricultural purposes-No new material-Reassessment notice was quashed. [S. 54B, 148, Art. 226]

Gujarat Ambuja Exports Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 225 (Guj.) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Deduction windmill unit-Set off brought forward losses/unabsorbed depreciation-Reassessment notice was held to be not justified. [S. 32, 80IA, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]