Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 438 ITR 536/ 283 Taxman 427 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 43A : Rate of exchange-Foreign currency-Cancellation of forward contract-Capital receipt-Interest portion assessable as revenue receipt-Actual cost of assets-Amendment with effect from 1-4-2003 is not retrospective-Actual payment not condition precedent for adjustment in cost of fixed asset acquired in foreign Currency. [S. 4, 28(1)]

PCIT v. M. Abdul Zahid (2021)437 ITR 132 (Karn.)(HC) PCIT v. Jay Minerals (2021)437 ITR 132 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Purchases from unregistered dealers-Matter remanded.

Swan Silk (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 191 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 40(a)(iia) : Amounts not deductible-Wealth tax-Matter remanded.

Swan Silk (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 191 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Credit card expenses-Not produced the evidence-Business development expenses-Foreign Travel Expenses-Not allowable as deduction.

V.C. Arunai Vadivelan v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 90 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-10% ad-hoc disallowance-Transport charges-Self made vouchers-Matter remanded for de novo consideration for verification of all documents. [S. 145]

PCIT v. M. Abdul Zahid (2021) 437 ITR 132 /(2022) 286 Taxman 138 (Karn.) (HC) PCIT v. Jay Minerals (2021) 437 ITR 132 / ( 2022) 286 Taxman 138 (Karn.) (HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Expenditure incurred in violation of statutory provisions-Not allowable as deduction-Explanation 1 [Mines And Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act, 1957, S. 4(1a), 21]

Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 438 ITR 526/ 283 Taxman 427 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Club membership fees-Club service charges-Membership fee allowable as deduction-Amount spent on services is held to be not allowable.

Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 438 ITR 526/ 283 Taxman 427 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Acquisition of equipment-Used by dealer in showrooms-Not allowable as revenue expenditure. [S. 32]

Apollo Tyres Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 438 ITR 536/ 283 Taxman 427 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for commission-Ad-hoc basis-Not deductible.

CIT v. Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. (2021) 438 ITR 465 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Ex gratia payments to employees-Allowable as deduction.