Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


P.R.Packaging Service v. ACIT ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline .org

S.43B: Deductions on actual payment – Adjustment u/s 143(1)(iv)(a)- Disallowance under section 36(1)(va) of the Act – Assessing Officer could not make disallowance based on observations made in Tax audit report that payments were made after due date specified under respective Acts- Adjustment u/s 143(1)(iv)(a) of the Act is bad in law – Judgement of Supreme Court in Checkmate Services Pvt Ltd v. CIT (2022) 448 ITR 518/ 218 DTR 218 / 143 taxmann.com 178 (SC) was rendered in the context where the assessment was farmed under section 143(3) of the Act hence not applicable when the adjustment is made u/s 143(1) of the Act. [ S. 2(24), 36(1)(va) , 139(1), 143(1), 143(i))(a)(v) ]

National Institute of Women Child & Rural Health Trust v. JCIT (2022) 194 ITD 214 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 272A : Penalty-Failure to answer questions-Sign statements-Furnish information-Illness of managing trustee of trust-Reasonable cause-Levy of penalty is not valid. [S. 139, 272A(2)(e), 273B]

ACIT v. DA Jhaveri (2022) 194 ITD 600 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 271G : Penalty-Documents-International transaction-Transfer pricing-Bench marking is accepted-Deletion of penalty is valid. [S. 92C, R. 10D(1)]

ACIT v. Enhance Ambient Communication (P.) Ltd. (2022) 194 ITD 40// 220 TTJ 947 / 220 DTR 229 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 271G : Penalty-Documents-International transaction-Transfer pricing-Valid satisfaction not recorded-Levy of penalty is not valid. [S. 92CA, 92D, 271(1)(c)]

Faith Intertrade v. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 474 /(2023) 222 TTJ 659/ 224 DTR 259(Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 271BA : Penalty-Failure to furnish reports-International transaction-Transfer pricing-Bona fide belief-levy of penalty deleted. [S. 92CA, 92E]

Vimalachal Print & Pack (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 671 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Disallowance of claim-mistakenly not added foreign exchange fluctuation amount to his income-Levy of penalty is not valid.

ACIL Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 194 ITD 708 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Not specifying the charge-Bogus purchases-Levy of penalty is not valid. [S. 153A, 274]

Bharath Wind Farm Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 636 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 268A : Appeal-Monetary limit-Tax effect of quantum addition under dispute by revenue was less than prescribed monetary limit as fixed by relevant CBDT Circular, revenue’s appeal was to be dismissed.

ITO v. Palak Chinubhai Patel. (2022) 194 ITD 470 (Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 268A : Appeal-Monetary limit-Penny stock-Shown as business income-Long term capital gains-Appeal of Revenue is as withdrawn on account of low tax effect. [S. 45]

Kyori Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 651 (Hyd.) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Transferred part of converted capital asset into stock-in-trade-failure to make enquiry-Revision is valid. [S. 45, 48]