Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


TATA Chemicals Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)95 ITR 134/ 216 TTJ 402 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 80IB : Industrial undertakings-Subsidy-Profits derived from business-Subsidies given by Government to enable sale to Farmers at, or below, maximum retail price-Form part of business profits-Subsidy eligible for deduction. [S. 2(24)(xvii), 148]

Jindal Steel and Power Ltd v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Fair market value-Price sold by State Electricity Board to consumers-Not at which the price is supplied by assessee to State Electricity Board. [S. 80IA(8)]

Dy. CIT v. Halliburton Technology Industries Pvt. Ltd. (2022) 99 ITR 699 (Pune) (Trib)

S. 80IA :Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Abnormal profits-Eligible for deduction. [S.10B(7), 80IA(7), 115JB]

Dy. CIT v. Wind World India Ltd. (2022)98 ITR 22 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 80IA: Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Failure to file Form No 10CCB-Disallowance is justified.

Jindal Steel and Power Ltd v. Add. CIT (2022)97 ITR 516 (Delhi) (Trib)

S. 80HHC : Export business-Book profit-Eligible for entire deduction on export. [S. 115JB Expln. (iv).]

Pavan Anil Bakeri v. Dy. CIT (2022)98 ITR 71 (SN) (Ahd) Trib)

S. 80GGC : Contribution-Any person-Political parties-Evidence not provided-Funds transferred to proprietor of firms and further transferred to other entities-Financial manoeuvre to legalize illicit money and to evade taxes-Disallowance is justified.

Shri Sant Zolebaba Sansthan Chikhali v. CIT (E) (2022) 215 DTR 229 / 220 TTJ 540 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 80G : Donation-Charitable objects-Expenses are less than the prescribed percentage-Directed to allow the approval. [S. 80G(5)(vi)]

Gayatri Parivar Trust Bhoranj v. CIT (E) (2022)96 ITR 435 (Chd) (Trib)

S. 80G : Donation-Charitable institution-No allegation that the Trust did not fulfil conditions required Under Section 80G(5)(vi)-Denial of approval is not valid. [S. 12AA, 80G(5)(vi)]

Capgemini Technology Services India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 220 TTJ 409 (Pune) (Trib)

S. 74 : Losses-Capital gains-Amalgamation-Carry forward and set off-Long-term capital loss of amalgamating company-The benefit of carry forward and set-off has to be allowed to the amalgamated company-.Section 72A applies only in respect of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation under the head Profits and gains of business or profession. [S. 72A]

ACIT v. J.P. Morgan India Investment Co. Mauritius Ltd (2022) 220 TTJ 281// 219 DTR 1 / (2023) 198 ITD 392 (Mum) (Trib)

S. 74 : Losses-Capital gains-Carry forward and set off by non-Resident-Capital losses which have been brought forward from earlier years have to be carried forward to the subsequent years without setting off the same against the capital gains of the relevant assessment year-DTAA-India-Mauritius. [S. 90, Art. 13(4)]