Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (TDS)-LTU (2021) 434 ITR 719/ 205 DTR 395/ 322 CTR 452/ 281 Taxman 527 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Mere entries in accounts-No accrual of income-Not liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 40(a)(i), 40(a)(ia), 192, 194C, 201(IA)

Concentrix Services Netherlands B. V. v. ITO (TDS) 2021)434 ITR 516/ 201 DTR 17/ 320 CTR 361 (Delhi)(HC) Optum Global Solutions International B.V. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 434 ITR 516 / 201 DTR 17 / 320 CTR 361 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 197 : Deduction at source-Certificate for lower rate-Double taxation Avoidance Agreement-Protocol-Common interpretation-Deduction of tax at source-Withholding rate tax in respect of dividend would be 5 percent-DTAA-India-Netherland. [S. 90, 195, Art. 226]

Honda Motor Co. Ltd., In.re. (2021) 434 ITR 229 (AAR)

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Agreement with Indian Import of cars as completely built up units on principal to principal basis-Title and risk in goods transferred at port of delivery, payment made outside India and transaction complete outside India-No business connection-Not liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-Japan. [S. 9(1)(i), 195, Art. 5(1)(9)]

National Institute of Technology v. UOI (2021) 434 ITR 361 / 201 DTR 283 320 CTR 756 / 278 Taxman 117 (Tripura)(HC)

S. 192 : Deduction at source-Salary-Provision of residential accommodation by employer-Valuation of perquisite-Residential Accommodation provided to regular and contract employees on collection of licence fee according to area of quarters and commensurate with salary of employee-Perquisite-Liable to deduct tax at source. [S. 15, 17(2), ITR, 1962, R. 3(1) Art. 12, 226]

B. Kubendran v. Dy.CIT (2021) 434 ITR 161 / 203 DTR 235/ 126 taxmann.com 107/(2022) 324 CTR 492 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Principle of natural justice must be followed-Notice u/s. 143(2) is not mandatory-Order quashed and set aside. [S. 143(2), 158BC, Art. 226]

Agni Estates and Foundations (P) Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 434 ITR 79 / / 204 DTR 1/ 321 CTR 531 (Mad.)(HC) Jayaprakash .R.N . v .PCIT 2021)434 ITR 79 / 204 DTR 1/ 321 DTR 531 (Mad) (HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Block assessment-Failure to hand over seized material by Investigation Officer to Assessing Officer within prescribed time-limit-Notice will not be invalid. [S. 132, 132(9A), 153B, Art. 226]

Vama Sundari Investments (Delhi) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 174 / 205 DTR 299/ 281 Taxman 260 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation of companies-Amalgamating company and amalgamated company operating from same address after amalgamation-Provision of Section 170(2) applicable-Participated in the reassessment proceedings-Notice and reassessment proceedings valid. [S. 147, 170(2), Art. 226]

Purshottambhai Bachubhai Pitroda v. Dy.CIT (2021) 434 ITR 629 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Assessee has right to raise objections-Duty of Assessing Officer to consider objections-Failure to consider objections-Matter remanded. [S. 147, Art. 226]

Palaniammal Palaniappan v. ITO (2021) 434 ITR 668 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Proper procedure to be adopted-Writ against the notice was dismissed. [S.147, Art. 226]

Bharatkumar Nihalchand Shah v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 621/ 281 Taxman 521 / 210 DTR 48 / 325 CTR 410(Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Information received from Investigation wing-Non application of mind-Sanction not obtained-Notice is held to be not valid. [S. 133A, 148, 151, Art. 226]