S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Housing projects-No failure to disclose any material facts-Reassessment is not valid. [S. 80IB(10), 148, Art. 226]

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Failure to disclose true facts-Share capital-Kolkata based companies-Reassessment notice is held to be valid. [S. 143(1), 148, Art. 226]

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No payment of interest or remuneration-Notice on ground that payments must have been made-Not valid. [S. 80(IB)(10), 148, Art. 226]

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-Policed diamonds-Subsequent information-Transaction disclosed in the original assessment proceedings were not valid-Sanction obtained-Reassessment was held to be valid. [S. 132, 148, 151, Art. 226]

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-Facts disclosed in the original assessment proceedings were false-Notice is held to be valid [S.148, Art, 226]

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Report of investigation wing-Non application of mind by the Assessing Officer-Notice not valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Arm’s length price-Objection considered by the Dispute Resolution panel-Alternative remedy-Every error of an authority is not open to judicial review merely by terming it a “jurisdictional error”, although it may, at a later stage, be set aside for being erroneous-Writ is not maintainable [S. 92C, 92CA, 144C(5), 253, Art. 14, 19(1)(g), 226, 265]

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-Assessing Officer can issue more than one notices-Writ is not maintainable to quash third notice. [Art. 226]

S. 132 : Search and seizure-Warrant of Authorisation-Search proceedings against company-Application of mind-Warrant of Authorisation is held to be valid. [Art. 226]

S. 115JB : Book profit-Amount disallowed u/s. 14A cannot be included. [S. 14A]