Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Distributors India (South) v. UOI (NO. 1) (2022) 446 ITR 163 / 288 Taxman 346 /(2023) 332 CTR 585(All.)(HC) Editorial : Review petition dismissed, Distributors India (South) v. UOI.(No. 2) (2022) 446 ITR 177 /(2023) 332 CTR 574(All.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Failure To Disclose material facts-Not disclosing receipts under Section 194J and reimbursement of expenses-Proper recording of satisfaction-Notice valid. [S. 148, 151, 194C, 194J, Form 26AS]

Ambuj Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. PRCIT (2022) 446 ITR 294 / 287 Taxman 490/ 219 DTR 65 / 329 CTR 205 (All.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-False disclosure is not true disclosure-Shell companies-Share premium-Share capital-Radha Fincom Pvt Ltd-Information from investigation wing-Bogus share capital-Notice valid-Writ petition was dismissed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. NFAC (2022) 446 ITR 734 / 287 Taxman 40// 220 DTR 105/ 329 DTR 502 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Principles of natural justice-Precedent-Decision of Supreme Court binding on all Courts and all authorities-Appellate Tribunal-Decision of Tribunal is binding on all authorities. [S. 254(1), Art. 226]

Omkar Nath v. NFAC (2022) 446 ITR 337 / 287 Taman 108 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Variation in income prejudicial to assessee-Failure to provide requested opportunity of personal hearing-Assessment order and consequent notices set aside. [S. 143(3), 144B(7)(vii), 156, 270A, Art. 226]

Popular Vehicles and Services Ltd. v. NEAS (2022) 446 ITR 374 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Draft assessment-Modification in return-Principle of natural justice-Order set aside. [Art. 226]

K. A. Rauf v. ACIT (No. 2) (2022) 446 ITR 436 (Ker.)(HC) Editorial : Order of single judge, K.A. Rauf v. ACIT (No. 1) (2022) 446 ITR 432 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment order-Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Order passed without giving an opportunity of cross examination-Writ petition was filed after one year of passing of the Order-Writ is not maintainable-Order of single judge is affirmed. [S. 131, 246A, Art. 226]

Dastan Residency v. NEAC (2022) 446 ITR 571 / 210 DTR 271 /325 CTR 468/ 138 taxmann.com 375 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Violation of natural justice-High-pitched assessment-Denial of opportunity for personal hearing-Assessment not valid. [S. 143(3A), 143(3B), Art. 226]

Ankit Ispat Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (OSD) (2022) 446 ITR 157 / 288 Taxman 102 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Estimation of gross profit-Question of fact-Appeal is not maintainable. [S. 260A]

PCIT v. Batliboi Environmental Engineering Ltd. (2022) 446 ITR 238 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Bogus purchases-No rule that entire purchases should be added-Sales accepted-Disallowance of 12.5 Per Cent. of purchases held to be proper. [S. 37(1)]

PCIT v. Wipro Ltd. (2022) 446 ITR 1 / 216 DTR 1 / 327 CTR 381 140 taxmann.com 223 (SC) Editorial : Decision of the Karnataka High Court in PCIT v. Wipro Ltd [2021] 17 ITR-OL 253 (Karn) reversed.Editorial: Application for listing Review Petition in open Court was rejected , Wipro Ltd v.PCIT( 2022) 289 Taxman 621 ( SC)

S. 139 : Return of income-Revised return-Export-oriented undertaking-Declaration to be furnished to Assessing Officer in writing and before due date for filing return-Filing original return on due date with Auditor’s report claiming exemption and not carrying forward any loss-Claim of exemption withdrawn in revised return filed after due date and loss claimed to be carried forward-Held to be not permissible. [S. 10B(5), 10B(8), 72, 80, 139(1), 139(3), 139(5)]