Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Balaram Suryavanshi v. ITO (2022) 93 ITR 4 (SN) (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Purchase of immovable property for value less than stamp duty value-Amendment is applicable for assessment year 2014-15 and subsequent years-Amendment is not retrospective-Unable to explain the source of cash payment-Assessable as income undisclosed income. [S. 56 (2)(vii)(b), 69].

Niyant Heritage Hotels (P.) Ltd. v ITO (2022) 93 ITR 11 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Payment For Pest Control after deduction of tax at source-No disallowance can be made-Building maintenance-Matter remanded. [S. 194C]

Rajiv Gupta v. ITO (2022) 93 ITR 3 (SN) (SMC) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Agent of Life Insurance Corporation-Expenses related to salary, staff welfare and bonus-Disallowance on guess work is held to be not valid.

Pragati Glass Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 93 ITR 42 (SN) (Surat)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Construction of new roads-Capital expenditure-Share premium-Interest on borrowed capital-Matter remanded. [S. 36(1)(iii), 68]

ITO v. Karnataka State Industrial Co-Operative Bank Ltd. (2022) 93 ITR 50 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Increased liability on account of wage revision due to Court order-Entries in books of account not determinative-Right to claim legitimate deduction-Allowable as deduction. [S. 139(5), 145]

ITO v. Karnataka State Industrial Co-Operative Bank Ltd. (2022) 93 ITR 50 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Increased liability on account of wage revision due to Court order-Entries in books of account not determinative-Right to claim legitimate deduction-Allowable as deduction. [S. 139(5), 145]

Chhabra Triple Five Fashions Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022)93 ITR 19 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Commission to increase sales-Free Lance Individuals-Allowable as business expenditure.

SDN and Co. v. ITO (2022) 93 ITR 23 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(vii) : Bad debt-Finance business-Interest income assessed as business income-Merely because parties related, Loss written off could not be disallowed. [S. 36(2)]

PCI LTD. v. ACIT (2022) 93 ITR 47 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Strategic investments Joint venture company group and subsidiary companies-Disallowance of interest is not justified.

ACIT v. Kalthia Engineering and Construction Ltd. (2022) 93 ITR 30 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Own capital and reserves more than capital advanced-Disallowance of interest is not justified.