Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited v. ITO (2021)190 ITD 193/ 212 TTJ 498/ 203 DTR 279 (Dehradun)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Change of opinion-Exemption-Notice was quashed on account of change of opinion and first proviso too section 147. [S. 10(26BBB), 148]

ACIT v. K. S. Chawla & Sons (HUF) (2021) 212 TTJ 199 / 203 DTR 180/(2022) 95 ITR 294 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Re-assessment-Search-On money-Additional ground-AO made reopening relying upon information received from search proceedings in case of third party-Held reassessment proceedings null and void-Only 153C valid in case of information received from third party-Assessment was quashed. [S.132, 148, 153A, 153C, 254(1)]

ACIT v. Bharti Axa Life Insurance Company Ltd (2021) 189 ITD 450 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Recorded reasons-Complete text of reasons recorded was not given-Sanction was vague-No new tangible material on record-Reassessment was quashed. [S. 148, 151]

Kaur Sain Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 189 ITD 515 (Chd.) (Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Borrowed satisfaction-Cash credits-Accommodation entries-AO issued reopening notice merely on basis of information received from department and he had not pointed out as to how investment in question was unexplained income of assessee, order passed by AO was to be quashed. [S. 68, 132, 147, 148]

Dhananjay Marketing v. CIT (2021) 212 TTJ 877 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Search and Seizure-On money-Loose sheets-Purchase of land Addition on the basis of statement of third party-AO made addition based on the statement given by third party-No incriminating material found suggesting the payment of on-money consideration-Tribunal Deleted addition. [S. 132(4), 132(4A)]

ACIT v. Narula Educational Trust. (2021) 189 ITD 31 / 86 ITR 365 / 211 TTJ 39 / 205 DTR 95 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 142A : Estimate of value of assets by Valuation Officer-Search and seizure-DDIT (Inv)/ADIT (Inv) was empowered to make reference to Valuation Officer inserted by section 132(9D) only after 1-4-2017 by an amendment by Finance Act, 2017-Addition made on the basis of valuation report was held to be not valid-Valuation report cannot be considered as incriminating document. [S. 132(9D), 153A]

Ahmed Shareef v. Dy. CIT (2021) 189 ITD 522 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 132(4) : Search and seizure-Statement on oath-When the addition was made on account of seized material once again addition cannot be made on the basis of statement which will lead to double addition. [S. 132, 143(3), 153A]

ACIT v. Deepak Sehgal (2021) 189 ITD 78 (Lucknow)(Trib.)

S. 124 : Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer-Return filed in Kolkata-Proof of change of address in PAN database proved that assessee had changed his address properly and department was already in knowledge of address of assessee at Kolkata-Assessment initiated by Assessing Officer from Kanpur-Notice and assessment is held to be in valid. [S. 142(3), 143(3), 150]

Dy. CIT v. Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 190 ITD 312 / 212 TTJ 292 / 203 DTR 265 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 115-O : Domestic companies-Tax on distributed profits- Whether the protection granted by the tax treaties under section 90 of the Income-tax Act 1961, in respect of taxation of dividend in the source jurisdiction, can be extended, even in the absence of a specific treaty provision to that effect, to the dividend distribution tax under section 115 ‘0’ in the hands of a domestic company ? Registry is directed to place the matter before the Honourable President for his kind consideration for the appropriate orders. [S. 255(4)]

Jayant Packaging (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 189 ITD 321/(2022) 96 ITRR 411 (Chen.)(Trib.)

S. 115JB : Book profit-When income is not reported in its P&L account, could not be said that its prepared in accordance with Part II and III of Schedule-VI to Companies Act. AO is justified to re-compute book profit u/s. 115JB-Disallowance u/s. 14A r.w. rule 8D is not to be applied while determining book profits. [S. 14A, R. 8D]