Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Seven Hills Educational Society v. ITO (E) (2025) 210 ITD 234 (Hyd.) (Trib.)

S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration -Selecting wrong selection code – Delay is condoned – CIT( E) is directed to hear the assessee by allowing it to apply under Form 10A . [ S. 12A(1)(ac)(iii) Form No 10A/10B ]

ACIT (E) v. Mazdoor Welfare Trust [2024] 169 taxmann.com 733 / (2025) 233 TTJ 49 (UO) (Chennai)( Trib)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – If past-year discrepancies, if resolved, do not justify denying exemption in subsequent years. [ Form 10B ]

Seth Chagan Mall Hira Lakll Dugar Charitable Trust v. ITO, ( E ) (2025) 210 ITD 266(SMC) (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Failure to file Form No 9A along with the return- Filed later on – Denial of exemption is not justified . [ S.11(2)(ii), 139 , Form No 9A ]

Sree Narayana Dharma Sabha Kodungallur v. ITO(E) (2025) 210 ITD 227 (Cochin) (Trib.)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Kuri and finance – Amount spent for object of the Trust – Entitle to exemption .[ S.2(15 ) ]

Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises v. Dy. CIT (E) (2025) 210 ITD 429 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Charitable purpose – Provision of credit guarantee for loans to micro and small enterprises – Entitle to exemption- Provision for guarantee claim – Allowable as deduction [ S. 37(1) ]

K. M. Educational & Rural-Development Trust v. ITO [2025] 210 ITD 574 (Chennai)(Trib. )

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Late filing of return – CBDT Circular clarifies that trusts are eligible for exemption u/s.11 even if the return is filed belatedly, provided it is filed within the time permitted u/s.139 (4A) [ S. 139(4A) ]

Dassault Systems SolidWorks Corporations v. ACIT (IT) (2025) 210 ITD 476 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Royalty – US based company – Amount received by assessee from Indian customers on account of sale of software solutions – Not royalty income- DTAA -India -USA. [ Art. 12 ]

Manthan System Inc v. DCIT (IT). [2025] 121 ITR 198/172 taxmann.com 8 (Bang)( Trib)

S. 9(1)(vii):Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Fees for technical services -Sales commission received by USA Company from Indian company – marketing services provided outside India – Cannot be considered as FTS under 9(1)(vii) and Article 12 of DTAA –Not taxable in India – DTAA -India -USA [ Art. 12 ]

Bently Nevada LLC v. ACIT, IT (2025) 210 ITD 191 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Business connection -Assessee, US based company, had closed its Liaison Office (LO) operations in India and no business activity was carried out through the LO – Held, since assessee had no PE in India – Question of attribution of profits to PE in India did not arise – therefore, amounts paid by resident Indian end-users/distributions to the Assessee as consideration for resale/use of computer software through EULAs/distribution agreements, is not payment of royalty for use of copyright in computer software- DTAA -India -USA .[ Art.5 ]

J.M. Voith SE & Co. KG v. DCIT (IT) 2024) 161 taxmann.com 734 / [2025] 121 ITR 402( (Delhi)( Trib)

S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Business connection – AO considered assessee as supervisory PE – Estimated profit of 10% as profit rate on income earned and 25% as attributable towards PE – Held profits were taxable in India- ad-hoc percentage cannot be applied – matter set-aside to the Assessing Officer – DTAA -India – Germany .[ Art. 5, 7 ]