Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Adhiprasakthi Charitable, Medical, Educational & Cultural Trust v. DGI (Inv.) (2021) 277 Taxman 355 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Educational institution-Application is allowed to be proceeded with-Settlement Commission have exclusive jurisdiction to perform functions of Income-tax authority as provided under section 245F of the Act-Withdrawal of exemption by Director General (Inv.) was held to be not valid. [S. 10(23C)(iv), 132, 153A, 245C, 245F(2) Art, 226]

Agilent Technologies India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 277 Taxman 153 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 240 : Refund-Appeal effect was not given for eight months-Court directed to pass appeal effect order and to grant refund along with interest. [S. 154, 244A, Art. 226]

CIT v. Canara Bank (2021) 277 Taxman 414 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Mere grant of stay of demand the assessee cannot be absolved from mandatory levy of interest. [S.220(2)]

PCIT v. S.R. Trust (2021) 438 ITR 506/ 277 Taxman 133/ 208 DTR 325 / 323 CTR 1047 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and Seizure-In absence of any incriminating documents or evidence discovered against assesse the assessment is bad in law. [S. 12AA, 132]

PPN Power Generating Company (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2021) 277 Taxman 240 / 200 DTR 382 / 320 CTR 268 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Transfer pricing-Objection not disposed of against reassessment notice-Single judge directed the Assessee to participate in adjudicating mechanism-Order of single judge is affirmed in appeal. [S. 92C, 92D, 92E, 148, Art. 226]

CIT v. Janak Shantilal Mehta (2021) 277 Taxman 385 / 200 DTR 385 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Reasons recorded not communicated-Reassessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 147, 292BB]

PCIT v. Andaleeb Sehgal (2021) 124 taxmann.com 246 (Delhi)(HC). Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed, PCIT v. Andaleeb Sehgal (2021) 277 Taxman 492 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Unexplained money-Enforcement Directorate without making any independent inquiry himself into matter-Borrowed satisfaction-Reassessment was held to be not valid. [S. 69A]

CIT v. Shriram Chits (Karnataka) (P.) Ltd. (2021) 277 Taxman 224 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Business expenditure-Loss on bidding deduction-Tribunal quashed the reassessment on the ground that there was no failure on the part of assessee to disclose all material facts-High court quashed the order of Tribunal and remanded the matter back to Tribunal to decide on merit afresh. [S. 37(1)), 148]

T. Stanes and Company Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 435 ITR 539/ 202 DTR 78/ 321 CTR 153/ 277 Taxman 230 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-When re-assessment proceedings to disallow brought forward loss were held to be without jurisdiction, High Court could not issue fresh directions to Assessing Officer to look into other grounds. [S.72, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Akshit Kumar (2021) 277 Taxman 423 / 197 DTR 121 / 318 CTR 26 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Business of textile-Cash sales-Income from undisclosed sources-Income from other sources-Sale of opening stock cannot be treated as income from undisclosed sources. [S. 56, 68, 133A]