Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Total Transport Systems Ltd v. ITO ( 2020) 187 DTR 53/ 203 TTJ 385 (Bang )(Trib)

S. 246A : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Appealable orders –Dismissal of appeal – CIT (A) is directed to decide the appeal on merits . [ S.234E, 250 ]

Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd v. ACIT ( 2020) 187 DTR 217 /207 TTJ 764 ( Jodhpur ) ( Trib)

S. 206C : Collection at source – Trading – Alcoholic liquor – Forest produce – Scrap – Levy of interest – Merely because the form No 27 filed by the assessee was incomplete levy of interest is not justified . [ S.201(IA , 206 (7) )

Dy. CIT v. Haryana Ware housing Corporation (2020) 188 DTR 360 / 204 TTJ 265 (Chd.) (Trib.)

S. 154 : Rectification of mistake – Review is not possible – Ascertain the correct and true nature of expenses – Rectification is held to be bad in law [ S. 37 (1) , 143 ( 3) ]

Ajay Sharma v. Dy. CIT (2020) 187 DTR 132 / 204 TTJ 281 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 153D : Assessment – Search – Approval -Information through RTI – Approval not obtained – Order is bad in law [ S.143(3), 153A ]

K.P. Cold Storage v .ITO ( 2019 ) 201 TTJ 649/ ( 2020) 189 DTR 385 (Agra)(Trib)

S. 148 : Reassessment – Notice – Valid service of notice is not mere procedural requirement , it is a condition precedent to validity of any assessment or reassessment – If notice issued is shown as invalid , subsequent proceedings shall be illegal – Service by affixture – Reassessment was quashed as the service of notice was not proper as per the law as per Order V, Rule 12, Rule 17, rule 19, Rule 20(1) and Order III, Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 . [ S. 147, 149, 282 ]

Arora / Sapra S.N. v. ITO (2020) 187 DTR 121 / 204 TTJ 137 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment – Cash credits – Information from investigation wing – Merely on the basis of information from investigation wing without any further verification reassessment is bad in law [ S.68, 148 ]

Reuters Transaction Services Ltd v. Dy . CIT ( 2020) 187 DTR 268/ 204 TTJ 624 ( Mum) ( Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel – Draft order was not signed and stamped by the Assessing Officer- Order is not invalid [ S. 143 ( 3) , 292B]

TDK Electronics ag (Formerly known as EPCOS AG) v. ACIT (2020) 188 DTR 328 / 204 TTJ 273 (Pune) (Trib)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel – Time barred objections –DRP rejected the application as time barred – Assessing Officer is required to complete the assessment with one month from end of month in which period of filing of objections under sub-section (2) expires— Assessment order is barred by limitation [ S.92CA, 144C (2) , 144C(3) 144C (13) ]

Sayyed Hamid Ali v ACIT ( 2020 189 DTR 369/ 205 TTJ 453 ( Indore )( Trib)

S. 133A :Power of survey –Excess stock – Surrender in the course of survey – Merely on the basis surrender made in the course of survey addition is held to be not justified- Estimated addition on net profit was also deleted . [ S.143 (3)]

Mytex Polymers India (P) Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2020) 187 DTR 137 / 204 TJ 371 (Jaipur) (Trib)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing – Arm’s length price – CUP method – Matter remanded for fresh adjudication .