Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Sonny Mobile Communications India Pvt Ltd ( Delhi) ( HC) .www.itatonline.org

S.254 (1): Appellate Tribunal – Additional ground – Appeal -High Court – Matter remanded to Tribunal by High Court Additional ground was raised when the matter remanded to Appellate Tribunal – Additional ground can be raised – Tribunal is justified in admitting the additional grounds- No question of law – Amalgamation –Merger – Non exiting Company – Issue of notice and Assessment – When a company is merged with another company after the filing of return but before original assessment order is passed and the original order and subsequent order in pursuance of remand from high court, in passed in the old name, is it a curable defect u/s 292B of the Income-tax Act,1961. Matter referred to larger Bench of Delhi high court on a difference of opinion. [ S. 143 (2),143 (3), 144C, 254 (1), 260A, 292B , ITAT R, 11)

Bhushan Lal Sawhney (Late , Shri ) , through his L.R / Wife Smt. Sneh Lata Sawhney v. Dy. CIT (Delhi ) ( Trib) . www.itatonline.org

S. 153A : Assessment – HSBC Bank Geneva-No addition can be made without any incriminating documents seized in the Course of Search-When the information is not provided by Swiss Competent Authority- No addition can be made as undisclosed asset in Swiss Account- Addition was deleted-Penalty was quashed-DTAA-India-France. [S.90, 132(4), 153B(1)(a), Art.26]S. 153A : Assessment – HSBC Bank Geneva-No addition can be made without any incriminating documents seized in the Course of Search-When the information is not provided by Swiss Competent Authority- No addition can be made as undisclosed asset in Swiss Account- Addition was deleted-Penalty was quashed-DTAA-India-France. [S.90, 132(4), 153B(1)(a), Art.26]

Devgiri Exports Ltd V. ITO (NFAC) ( Raj ) (HC) www.itatonline .org .

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment – Assessment order was passed without issuing show cause notice or draft assessment order -Violation of principle of natural justice – Alternative remedy is not bar – Operation of assessment order was stayed [S.143 (3), Art , 226 ]

Sanjay Aggarwal v. National Faceless Assessment Centre ( Delhi) (HC) www.itatonline .org.

S.144B: Faceless Assessment – Variation in income – Request made to personal hearing was not complied with – System has to be transparent and person administering it have to be accountable- Order was set aside . [ S.142 (1) , Art , 226 ]

Ketan Ribbons Pvt Ltd v. Faceless Assessment Centre (Delhi) (HC) www.itatonline .org

S. 143 (3)): Assessment – Faceless assessment – Natural Justice – Order passed during lockdown – Non compliance of notice – High Court by passing interim order stayed the assessment order. [ S. 144 , Art . 226 ]

N.S.S. Karayogam v. CIT (2020) 271 Taxman 193 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 271D : Penalty-Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Ignorance of provisions or lack of banking facilities in area-Not accepted as reasonable cause when the assessee doing large scale finance business dealing with public. [S. 269SS, 273B]

PCIT v. Dinesh Chandra Jain (2020) 271 Taxman 262 (All.)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Finding in assessment proceedings-Burden of proof-Gift held to be nongenuine-In penalty proceedings revenue authorities have to arrive at independent finding related to concealment of income or inaccurate particular. [S. 68]

Suneel Hirachand Shah v. ITO (2020) 271 taxman 97 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 254(2A) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Stay-Capital gains-Denial of exemption-Deposited a sum of Rs. 15.71 lakhs out of demand of Rs. 61.99 lakhs, and directed to deposit a further sum of Rs.15 lakhs and on such deposit there shall be an order of interim stay till disposal of appeal before Tribunal. [S. 10(38), 45, 254(1), Art. 226]

Chirayinkeezhu Service Co-op. Bank Ltd v. ITO (2020) 271 Taxman 72 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Dismissal of appeal on the ground of defective appeal-Rejection of stay application-Directed to file additional memorandum of appeal and stay application. [S. 220(6), 271B, Art. 226]

Aegis Customer Support Services (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 271 Taxman 198 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 237 : Refund-Delay in processing refund-Duties of tax Authorities-Directed to process return of income as expeditiously as possible and pay refund to assessee if any due. [S. 143(1), Art. 226]