Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

S. 4: Filing of declaration and particular to be furnished -Time Limits up to 31-3 -2021 – Appeal disposed of by Tribunal on 22-4-2021 – After disposal of appeal declaration was filed – Rejection of declaration is valid [ S. 2(1)(a), 3 , Art , 226 ]

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
S. 3: Amount payable by declarant – Time and manner of payment – Failure to make the payment within time prescribed – No vested right – Petition was dismissed [ S. 5 , Art , 226 ]

S. 151 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Limitation-Sanction-Sanction by Additional Commissioner instead of Principal Commissioner-Taxation and other laws (Relaxation of certain Provisions) Act, 2020 only extended period of limitation and not for approval by the competent Authority-Sanction by Additional Commissioner was held to be bad in law-Reassessment notice was quashed. [S. 147, 148, Art. 226]

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020 (2020) 422 ITR 121 (St)

S. 3 : Amount payable by declarant-Credit for tax paid under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016-Denial of credit is held to be not valid-Directed the Revenue to give credit and rectify Form No. 3 issued under DTVSV Act with DTVSV rules. [Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, S. 183, 184, 185, 191, Art. 226]

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Petition cannot be dismissed on the ground that the assessee has not waived the right of appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). [S. 246A, 264(4), Art. 226]

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-Business loss or speculation-Amount voluntary agreed can also be the subject matter of revision-Rejection of revision application was not valid-Directed the Commissioner to decide on merit after considering all the submissions. [S. 43(5)(d), 139, Art. 226]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Excess depreciation-Subsidy-Revision is held to be not valid-Order of Tribunal affirmed.[S.32, 43(1), 260A]

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Appeal which was dismissed and review petition also dismissed-Dismissal of rectification order by the Tribunal is justified. [S. 47(xiv), 260A, Art. 226]

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Reasons for re-opening-Non application of mind-Reasons recorded and reasons supplied are different-Column 9.in left blank-Column 8 the answer given was ‘Yes’ it should have been ‘No’-Reassessment notice and order disposing objection was quashed. [S. 147, 148, Art. 226]

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Mechanical approval-Non-application of mind-Approval was granted was based on erroneous statement recorded in reasons-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed. [S. 147, 148, Art. 226]