Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Charanjit Kaur (Smt.) v. ITO (2021) 88 ITR 414 / 211 TTJ 614/ 201 DTR 185 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Notice was not served-Approval granted was of mechanical manner-Legal issue-Additional ground was admitted-Reassessment proceedings is quashed. [S. 144, 147, 254(1), 282(1), Civil Procedure Code,1908, Order V rule 12, Order III rule 6]

Uttam Singh v. Dy. CIT(IT) (2021) 88 ITR (SN) 1 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Jurisdiction-Notice issued by one Officer-Reassessment order was passed by another circle-No order by Competent Authority transferring case-Order was liable to be quashed. [S. 127(2), 144, 148]

Clarion Power Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 88 ITR 3 (SN) (Hyd.) (Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Carbon credit-Capital receipt-Reassessment notice to contrary decision of High Court-Held to be in valid. [S. 4, 148]

Kaneria Granito Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 88 ITR 7 (SN) (Surat)(Trib.)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Ad-hoc disallowance on percentage basis-Books of account audited by chartered accountant-Ad-hoc disallowance was deleted [S. 37(1), 145(3)]

Golf View Homes Ltd. v. ACIT (2021)88 ITR 423 / 212 TTJ 472 / 207 DTR 199 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice issued by the Assessing Officer not having jurisdiction over assessee-Additional ground admitted-Not curable defects u/s .292BB of the Act-Assessment order was quashed. [S. 127(4), 254(1), 292BB]

ACIT v. Investment Trust of India Ltd. (2021) 88 ITR 566 / 211 TTJ 777 / 203 DTR 289 (Chennai) (Trib.) Dy. CIT v. HFCL Infotel Ltd. (2021) 88 ITR 566/ 211 TTJ 777 / 203 DTR 289 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 115JB : Book profit-Provision created for premium payable on redemption of debentures-Ascertained liability-Not to be added to book profits.

Fiserv India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 88 ITR 217 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Software development service-Comparable-Companies providing software development services as well as sale of software products-Directed to exclude from the final set of comparbles. [S. 92CA(3)]

ACIT v. Lifestyle International (P.) Ltd. (2021) 88 ITR 79 (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Payment of professional fees-No adjustment required-Assessing Officer cannot disallow expenses. [S. 37(1)]

KEC International Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 88 ITR 246 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Advances to associated enterprises-No interest chargeable-No adjustment is required-Performance bank guarantees-Commission was paid by its subsidiary-No adjustment required. [S. 92CA]

Dy. CIT v. Altisource Business Solutions P. Ltd. (2021) 88 ITR 135 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparables-Functional dissimilarity-Excluded. [S. 92CA]