Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


PCIT v. Equant Solutions India P. Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 315 (P&H)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Software product development-Company have brand value and more than 24 times that of turnover-Significant intangible assets-Business restructuring-Extraordinary event of amalgamation-Company which developed its own web based software-Huge brand value-BPO services-Additional evidence-Matter remanded. [S. 254(1), 260A]

PCIT v. Realvalue Realtors (P) Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 64 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share application money-Opening balance-Substantial loan was received in earlier year addition cannot be made-Sufficient evidence was produced as regards additional amount received during the year-Deletion of addition is held to be justified. [S.260A]

PCIT v. Star Entertainment Media (P) Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 66 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Marketing and publicity expenses-Star Pravaha-Star Maza-Allowable as business expenditure incidental benefit to some other party from such expenses, would not reduce allowability of such expenditure.

CIT v. KEC International Ltd. (2020) 269 Taxman 275 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital Investment in group companies for strategic business purpose-Allowable as deduction.

CIT(E) v. India Habitat Centre (2020) 269 Taxman 401 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Primary aim and objective to promote habitat concept-Registered as Charitable Trust-Principle of mutuality not required to be gone in to-Entitle to exemption. [S. 2(15), 12, 13]

PCIT v. Prince Water House (2020) 270 Taxman 307 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Risk Policy Premium-Revision barred by limitation-Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 37(1)]

Vipin Mehta v. CIT (2020) 270 Taxman 67 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Reference to DVO-Grounds not raised before the Tribunal-Not allowed to raise the ground in an appeal before High court. [S. 45, 50C, 254(1)]

Vattiyoorkavu Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 270 Taxman 274 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Dismissal of appeal as defective and also stay application-Matter remitted to Commissioner (Appeals) for consideration and decision afresh on merits. [S. 271B, Art. 226]

Suresh Anuradha v. CIT (2020) 270 Taxman 124 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay-Pendency of Appeal before CIT (A)-Directed to deposit Rs. 2 lakhs and stay was granted till disposal of appeal. [S. 220(6), 246A]

Vinodbhai Jivrajbhai Radbiya v. ITO (2020) 270 Taxman 304 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Any hypothesis or contingency that may emerge in future-Protective addition-Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 148, Art. 226]