Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Ashok Kumar v. ITO (2021) 86 ITR 576 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Purchase of property within one year before transfer-Actual possession handed over by within one year after transfer of second Property-Entitled to deduction. [S. 45]

Radharaman Constructions v. ACIT (2021) 86 ITR 44 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Departmental valuation officer-Objection of the assessee was not considered-Transfer of development rights-Matter remanded. [S. 45]

Green Valley Tower Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 86 ITR 1 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Purchase of land-Not debited to profit and loss account-Disallowance cannot be made.

ACIT v. Arvind Srinivasan (2021)86 ITR 84 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Purchase of capital asset or investment-No disallowance can be made.

ACIT v. Parag Fans and Cooling System Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 86 ITR 598 (Indore)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Settlement of loan shown in profit and loss account-No expenditure was claimed-No disallowance can be made.

A.O. Smith India Water Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 86 ITR 38 (SN.) (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Provision for advertisement-Liability crystalised in the following year-Not allowable-Provision for warranty-Directed to verify and allow.

ACIT v. Claridges Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 86 ITR 402 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Appointment of consultant as per agreement-Failure to get the business-Disallowance cannot be made-Not liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-UAE. [S. 40(a)(i), Art. 14(7), 22(1)]

ACIT v. Claridges Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 86 ITR 402 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Salaries paid-Relative of promoter-No disallowance can be made-The Assessing Officer is not entitle to decide reasonableness and commercial expediency of expenditure.

Deloitte Haskins and Sells v. ACIT (2021) 86 ITR 121 / 211 TTJ 89 / 202 DTR 349 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Chartered Accountants firm-Payment of subscription fees and reimbursement of its share to international group entity-Allowable as deduction-Criminal complaint filed against partner of firm related business of firm-Professional fees paid towards defending suit in the name of partner-Allowable as business expenditure.

ACIT v. Ariba Foods Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 86 ITR 174 (Indore)(Trib.) ACIT v. Vyanktesh Plastics and Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 86 ITR 174 (Indore)(Trib.) ACIT v. Famous Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 86 ITR 174 (Indore)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Power and fuel expenses-No defect in books of account-Financial statement audited-Ad Hoc Disallowance is held to be not justified. [S. 145]