Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Delphi Connection Systems India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 182 ITD 382 (Cochin)(Trib.)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Non-speaking order-Matter remanded. [S. 92C]

DCIT v. Asian Grantio India Ltd. (2020) 182 ITD 441 (Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Estimate of income-The AO cannot make addition on estimate basis when no specific defect or infirmity in the books of account maintained by the assessee. [S. 145]

Dashrathbhai G. Patel. v. DCIT (2020) 182 ITD 327 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 142A : Estimate of value of assets by Valuation Officer-Under valuation-Capital gains-Valuation as on 1-4-1981-Reference to Valuation Officer is held to be not valid. [S. 45, 55A(b)(i), 69, 69A, 69B].

DCIT v. Motisons Buildtech (P.) Ltd. (2020) 182 ITD 72/ 205 TTJ 484 (Jaipur)(Trib.) DCIT v. Motisons Entertainment ( P) Ltd (2020) 182 ITD 72/ 205 TTJ 484 (Jaipur) (Trib.) DCIT v. Mitisons Global ( P) Ltd Ltd (2020) 182 ITD 72/ 205 TTJ 484 (Jaipur) (Trib.)

S. 115JB : Book profit-Profit on sale of Agricultural land-Cannot be added to book profit. [S. 2(IA)]

DCIT v. Asian Grantio India Ltd. (2020) 182 ITD 441 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 115JB : Book profit-Exempt income-Disallowance u/s. 14A read with Rule 8D cannot resorted while determining the book profit. [S.14A , R.8D]

Samsung India Electronics (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 182 ITD 312 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Reimbursement of expenses-Bright-Line Text (BLT)-Interest-TPO could not have determined 30 days as credit period for computing interest on outstanding receivables, without appreciating actual credit terms offered to AEs.

Schindler India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 182 ITD 84 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Turnover filter-To be accepted as valid comparable.

Nagarro Software (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 182 ITD 128 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparble-Customised software development on contractual basis Job placement portal and BPO services-Dissimilarity in functions and for want of segmental accounts-Sponsorship fees and other expenses, said company was to be excluded from final set of comparables-Turnover more than 750 time cannot be considered as comparable-Profit margin-Sale of licence-Sale of software and products.

NXP India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 182 ITD 163 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Software development-Directed to pass speaking order-Working capital-computed by taking actual data without putting any upper limit-Ad-hoc estimate of risk differential was directed to recompute. [S. 144C]

Mformation Software Technologies (I) (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 182 ITD 78 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Functionally different-Companies having turn over of 10 times greater cannot be considered as comparable companies.